From: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH V3] drm/drm_vblank: Change EINVAL by the correct errno
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 23:10:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190613021054.cdewdb3azy6zuoyw@smtp.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2558 bytes --]
For historical reason, the function drm_wait_vblank_ioctl always return
-EINVAL if something gets wrong. This scenario limits the flexibility
for the userspace make detailed verification of the problem and take
some action. In particular, the validation of “if (!dev->irq_enabled)”
in the drm_wait_vblank_ioctl is responsible for checking if the driver
support vblank or not. If the driver does not support VBlank, the
function drm_wait_vblank_ioctl returns EINVAL which does not represent
the real issue; this patch changes this behavior by return EOPNOTSUPP.
Additionally, some operations are unsupported by this function, and
returns EINVAL; this patch also changes the return value to EOPNOTSUPP
in this case. Lastly, the function drm_wait_vblank_ioctl is invoked by
libdrm, which is used by many compositors; because of this, it is
important to check if this change breaks any compositor. In this sense,
the following projects were examined:
* Drm-hwcomposer
* Kwin
* Sway
* Wlroots
* Wayland-core
* Weston
* Xorg (67 different drivers)
For each repository the verification happened in three steps:
* Update the main branch
* Look for any occurrence "drmWaitVBlank" with the command:
git grep -n "drmWaitVBlank"
* Look in the git history of the project with the command:
git log -SdrmWaitVBlank
Finally, none of the above projects validate the use of EINVAL which
make safe, at least for these projects, to change the return values.
Change since V2:
Daniel Vetter and Chris Wilson
- Replace ENOTTY by EOPNOTSUPP
- Return EINVAL if the parameters are wrong
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com>
---
Update:
Now IGT has a way to validate if a driver has vblank support or not.
See: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/commit/2d244aed69165753f3adbbd6468db073dc1acf9A
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 0d704bddb1a6..d76a783a7d4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -1578,10 +1578,10 @@ int drm_wait_vblank_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
unsigned int flags, pipe, high_pipe;
if (!dev->irq_enabled)
- return -EINVAL;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (vblwait->request.type & _DRM_VBLANK_SIGNAL)
- return -EINVAL;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (vblwait->request.type &
~(_DRM_VBLANK_TYPES_MASK | _DRM_VBLANK_FLAGS_MASK |
--
2.21.0
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-06-13 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 2:10 Rodrigo Siqueira [this message]
2019-06-13 5:04 ` Drop use of DRM_WAIT_ON() [Was: drm/drm_vblank: Change EINVAL by the correct errno] Sam Ravnborg
2019-06-13 18:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-06-13 18:55 ` Rodrigo Siqueira
2019-06-14 17:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-06-13 8:21 ` [RESEND PATCH V3] drm/drm_vblank: Change EINVAL by the correct errno Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190613021054.cdewdb3azy6zuoyw@smtp.gmail.com \
--to=rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox