public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] msm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
       [not found] <20190613122402.GA30678@kroah.com>
@ 2019-06-13 12:37 ` Marc Gonzalez
  2019-06-13 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc Gonzalez @ 2019-06-13 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: LKML

On 13/06/2019 14:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.

Naive question: if callers are supposed to ignore the return value,
why not change the prototype to void (no return value) ?

Regards.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] msm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
  2019-06-13 12:37 ` [PATCH] msm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Marc Gonzalez
@ 2019-06-13 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2019-06-13 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Gonzalez; +Cc: LKML

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:37:46PM +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 13/06/2019 14:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
> 
> Naive question: if callers are supposed to ignore the return value,
> why not change the prototype to void (no return value) ?

I am trying to do that, but sometimes you need the return value (like
for debugfs_create_dir()).  I have removed the return value from a
number of debugfs calls already, but the kernel is vast and big, and the
tendrils of debugfs use is deep, it is taking a while :)

Don't worry, there are more patches to come, this is just the first
wave.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-13 15:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20190613122402.GA30678@kroah.com>
2019-06-13 12:37 ` [PATCH] msm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Marc Gonzalez
2019-06-13 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox