From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/vsyscall: Change the default vsyscall mode to xonly
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 22:19:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906132218.E923F38F@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUYNavL8pu4jQqJjoT=PdeRyjeoLDn=0r7h=2XsHDMezQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:14:50PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 1:44 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 01:25:31PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > The use case for full emulation over xonly is very esoteric. Let's
> > > change the default to the safer xonly mode.
> >
> > Perhaps describe the esoteric cases here (and maybe in the Kconfig help
> > text)? That should a user determine if they actually need it. (What
> > would the failure under xonly look like for someone needing emulate?)
>
> I added it to the Kconfig text.
>
> Right now, the failure will just be a segfault. I could add some
> logic so that it would log "invalid read to vsyscall page -- fix your
> userspace or boot with vsyscall=emulate". Do you think that's
> important?
I think it would be a friendly way to help anyone wondering why
something suddenly started segfaulting, yeah. Just a pr_warn_once() or
something (not a WARN() since it's "intentionally" reachable by
userspace).
--
Kees Cook
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-10 20:25 [PATCH 0/5] vsyscall xonly mode Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/vsyscall: Remove the vsyscall=native documentation Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/vsyscall: Add a new vsyscall=xonly mode Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 20:43 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-13 19:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/vsyscall: Document odd #PF's error code for vsyscalls Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-13 19:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/x86/vsyscall: Verify that vsyscall=none blocks execution Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/vsyscall: Change the default vsyscall mode to xonly Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 20:44 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-13 19:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-14 5:19 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201906132218.E923F38F@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox