From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/cpufeatures: Combine word 11 and 12 into new scattered features word 11
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614114410.GD2586@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560459064-195037-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:51:03PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> It's a waste for the four X86_FEATURE_CQM_* features to occupy two
> pure feature bits words. To better utilize feature words, re-define
> word 11 to host scattered features and move the four X86_FEATURE_CQM_*
> features into word 11. More scattered features can be added in word 11
> in the future.
>
> KVM doesn't support resctrl now. So it's safe to move the
> X86_FEATURE_CQM_* features to scattered features word 11 for KVM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index 9a327d5b6d1f..d78a61408243 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ static const struct cpuid_reg reverse_cpuid[] = {
> [CPUID_8000_0001_ECX] = {0x80000001, 0, CPUID_ECX},
> [CPUID_7_0_EBX] = { 7, 0, CPUID_EBX},
> [CPUID_D_1_EAX] = { 0xd, 1, CPUID_EAX},
> - [CPUID_F_0_EDX] = { 0xf, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> - [CPUID_F_1_EDX] = { 0xf, 1, CPUID_EDX},
I think you're going to have to change those to:
[CPUID_LNX_4] = { 0, 0, 0},
[CPUID_7_1_EAX] = { 7, 1, CPUID_EAX },
instead of removing them because kvm is basically hardcoding the feature
words and then bitches when array elements in the middle get removed:
In file included from ./include/linux/export.h:45,
from ./include/linux/linkage.h:7,
from ./include/linux/preempt.h:10,
from ./include/linux/hardirq.h:5,
from ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:10,
from arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:22:
In function ‘x86_feature_cpuid’,
inlined from ‘guest_cpuid_get_register’ at arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h:71:33,
inlined from ‘guest_cpuid_has’ at arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h:100:8,
inlined from ‘kvm_get_msr_common’ at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2804:8:
./include/linux/compiler.h:345:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_62’ declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: x86_leaf >= ARRAY_SIZE(reverse_cpuid)
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:326:4: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
prefix ## suffix(); \
^~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:345:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h:62:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
BUILD_BUG_ON(x86_leaf >= ARRAY_SIZE(reverse_cpuid));
^~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:345:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_63’ declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: reverse_cpuid[x86_leaf].function == 0
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:326:4: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
prefix ## suffix(); \
^~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:345:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h:63:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
BUILD_BUG_ON(reverse_cpuid[x86_leaf].function == 0);
^~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:278: arch/x86/kvm/x86.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:489: arch/x86/kvm] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [Makefile:1071: arch/x86] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 20:51 [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86/cpufeatures: Re-arrange a few features and enumerate AVX512 BFLOAT16 intructions Fenghua Yu
2019-06-13 20:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] x86/resctrl: Get max rmid and occupancy scale directly from CPUID instead of cpuinfo_x86 Fenghua Yu
2019-06-14 11:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 16:55 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-14 17:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 17:49 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-13 20:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/cpufeatures: Combine word 11 and 12 into new scattered features word 11 Fenghua Yu
2019-06-14 11:44 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-06-14 12:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 13:17 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-14 13:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 13:51 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-14 14:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 14:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-14 14:15 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-14 14:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 14:25 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-14 15:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 18:44 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-14 14:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 14:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-14 14:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 15:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-14 16:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-14 16:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-13 20:51 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate new AVX512 BFLOAT16 instructions Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190614114410.GD2586@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox