From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF9AC31E5B for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3130208C4 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:55:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560786927; bh=1b47WlW4PR2yZnyMSoLvFrpGsLhOodFKbTIZ5AcebYY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=jZ7OJYrGua+76gtVJPxsQHpvs5xuNKfiT4HRUs/5PdD69ov4j/rMJauIXvHXMo7rq UgIT1k6UEypJJYte/JunrxjCYwTVTv1mfOtZbORmCv3fxZSi9C5Z71QOr1oZmbvbzx EK7eyoSjg+Y13wf6cc9c/tIR0fw/BA4pnXS1mWNY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728552AbfFQPz0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:55:26 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:38560 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725863AbfFQPz0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:55:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+/5VA9ZuoXyLrG+BiiWydDZ/+oR7o3Vk3uSSQIEd16c=; b=gWNa6GaJ/p3/9QeUuIX0nsaxYa 2iVR/TxaDorIbG/lixhBnGTv/K/F8h/jNdQCRwn4NZpx55gNWejwIH9c7mghw2wHU3PEF6RMSVVTu 3jZSO6RQEurFZ/xoFL5QtSAzIA3CU1wYqyeBwatTPpNELSZOMYdeLcXNM2T7cLRcnqrxjIXVfjV9u zO9KhUOkc32z7SPrBr7C9s/db4SLpfTyTOZkbgDp3R4iAi1JyugKBzaEwuLvL7ShOLTn0wooZ6FZ4 27otCZgKtA/D4/MwEjKdAlIaQS82//4REyeHJTueyzawe8KUFOmzeyshx08keOARG1UkgSvNNwtQU qw6oNnvg==; Received: from 179.186.105.91.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br ([179.186.105.91] helo=coco.lan) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hctyd-0000g2-26; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:55:23 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:55:17 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Markus Heiser , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] docs: sphinx/kernel_abi.py: fix UTF-8 support Message-ID: <20190617125517.293fd50f@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190617075608.696cf037@lwn.net> References: <62c8ffe86df40c90299e80619a1cb5d50971c2c6.1560477540.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> <20190614161837.GA25206@kroah.com> <20190614132530.7a013757@coco.lan> <28aca947-4e88-7186-7f07-9a3ccb379649@darmarit.de> <20190617061659.22596fc3@coco.lan> <20190617075608.696cf037@lwn.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, 17 Jun 2019 07:56:08 -0600 Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 06:16:59 -0300 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >=20 > > > No need to change, the emacs notation is also OK, see your link > > >=20 > > > """or (using formats recognized by popular editors):""" > > >=20 > > > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0263/#defining-the-encoding > > >=20 > > > I prefer emacs notation, this is also evaluated by many other editors= / tools. =20 > >=20 > > The usage of emacs notation is something that we don't like at the > > Linux Kernel. With ~4K developers per release, if we add tags to > > every single editor people use, it would be really messy, as one > > developer would be adding a tag and the next one replacing it by its > > some other favorite editor's tag. =20 >=20 > So "we" like a language-specific notation instead? That seems a little > strange to me. Lots of things understand the Emacs notation, it doesn't > seem like something that needs to be actively avoided here. =46rom my side, I don't have any strong preference. Just saying that people usually complain when e-macs or vim specific tags appear at the Kernel. That's why I would prefer an editor-agnostic macro. It won't make any difference for me, anyway, as the editors I use don't recognize it. Whatever you want is OK to me, provided that we use the same notation on all Sphinx extensions... right now there's a mix of notations. Thanks, Mauro