Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] regulator: qcom_spmi: Add support for PM8005

Mark Brown
2019-06-17T15:05:09Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1496 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:25:53PM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:

> +static int spmi_regulator_ftsmps426_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> + unsigned selector)
> +{
> + struct spmi_regulator *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + u8 buf[2];
> + int mV;
> +
> + mV = spmi_regulator_common_list_voltage(rdev, selector) / 1000;
> +
> + buf[0] = mV & 0xff;
> + buf[1] = mV >> 8;
> + return spmi_vreg_write(vreg, SPMI_FTSMPS426_REG_VOLTAGE_LSB, buf, 2);
> +}

This could just be a set_voltage_sel(), no need for it to be a
set_voltage() operation....

> +static int spmi_regulator_ftsmps426_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + struct spmi_regulator *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + u8 buf[2];
> +
> + spmi_vreg_read(vreg, SPMI_FTSMPS426_REG_VOLTAGE_LSB, buf, 2);
> +
> + return (((unsigned int)buf[1] << 8) | (unsigned int)buf[0]) * 1000;
> +}

...or if the conversion is this trivial why do the list_voltage() lookup
above?

> +spmi_regulator_ftsmps426_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int mode)
> +{
> + struct spmi_regulator *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + u8 mask = SPMI_FTSMPS426_MODE_MASK;
> + u8 val;
> +
> + switch (mode) {
> + case REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL:
> + val = SPMI_FTSMPS426_MODE_HPM_MASK;
> + break;
> + case REGULATOR_MODE_FAST:
> + val = SPMI_FTSMPS426_MODE_AUTO_MASK;
> + break;
> + default:
> + val = SPMI_FTSMPS426_MODE_LPM_MASK;
> + break;
> + }

This should validate, it shouldn't just translate invalid values into
valid ones.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]