From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-x86 <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, "Liang,
Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/rapl: restart perf rapl counter after resume
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:50:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620125059.GZ3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560778897.10723.6.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 09:41:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> After S3 suspend/resume, "perf stat -I 1000 -e power/energy-pkg/ -a"
> reports an insane value for the very first sampling period after resume
> as shown below.
>
> 19.278989977 2.16 Joules power/energy-pkg/
> 20.279373569 1.96 Joules power/energy-pkg/
> 21.279765481 2.09 Joules power/energy-pkg/
> 22.280305420 2.10 Joules power/energy-pkg/
> 25.504782277 4,294,966,686.01 Joules power/energy-pkg/
> 26.505114993 3.58 Joules power/energy-pkg/
> 27.505471758 1.66 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>
> Fix this by resetting the counter right after resume.
Cute...
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +
> +static int perf_rapl_suspend(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + get_online_cpus();
> + for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
> + rapl_pmu_update_all(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
> + put_online_cpus();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_rapl_resume(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + get_online_cpus();
> + for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
> + rapl_pmu_restart_all(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
> + put_online_cpus();
> +}
What's the reason for that get/put_online_cpus() here ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-20 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-17 13:41 [PATCH] perf/rapl: restart perf rapl counter after resume Zhang Rui
2019-06-20 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-06-20 14:33 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190620125059.GZ3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox