public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-x86 <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, "Liang,
	Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/rapl: restart perf rapl counter after resume
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:50:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620125059.GZ3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560778897.10723.6.camel@intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 09:41:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:

> After S3 suspend/resume, "perf stat -I 1000 -e power/energy-pkg/ -a"
> reports an insane value for the very first sampling period after resume
> as shown below.
> 
>     19.278989977               2.16 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     20.279373569               1.96 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     21.279765481               2.09 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     22.280305420               2.10 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     25.504782277   4,294,966,686.01 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     26.505114993               3.58 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     27.505471758               1.66 Joules power/energy-pkg/
> 
> Fix this by resetting the counter right after resume.

Cute...


> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +
> +static int perf_rapl_suspend(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	get_online_cpus();
> +	for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
> +		rapl_pmu_update_all(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
> +	put_online_cpus();
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_rapl_resume(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	get_online_cpus();
> +	for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
> +		rapl_pmu_restart_all(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
> +	put_online_cpus();
> +}

What's the reason for that get/put_online_cpus() here ?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 13:41 [PATCH] perf/rapl: restart perf rapl counter after resume Zhang Rui
2019-06-20 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-06-20 14:33   ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190620125059.GZ3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox