public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: "wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com"
	<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	"bgolaszewski@baylibre.com" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com" 
	<kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"peda@axentia.se" <peda@axentia.se>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:33:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620133326.GE4699@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR10MB2181D2A08D98FB9F8092EC8DFEE40@AM6PR10MB2181.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Steve Twiss wrote:

> On 20 June 2019 13:29, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too
> > 
> > Why isn't this reply attached (threaded) to the patch.
> 
> My apologies. It wasn't my intention to split Wolfram's original e-mail thread.
> 
> I don't usually reply using the mailto: link from lore when creating e-mails.
> Outlook mustn't support the In-Reply-To header.
> 
> I'll figure out a different way to reply in future.
> 
> > Is your mailer broken?
> 
> It's Windows

Say no more. ;)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20  9:07 [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too Steve Twiss
2019-06-20  9:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-21  9:23   ` Steve Twiss
2019-06-21 10:09     ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-21 10:23       ` Steve Twiss
2019-06-20 12:28 ` Lee Jones
2019-06-20 12:44   ` Steve Twiss
2019-06-20 13:33     ` Lee Jones [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-19 17:18 Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190620133326.GE4699@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=Support.Opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox