From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] perf diff: Use hists to manage basic blocks per symbol
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:11:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625091134.GD9574@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561041402-29444-5-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:36:39PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
SNIP
> +
> +static void *block_entry_zalloc(size_t size)
> +{
> + return zalloc(size + sizeof(struct hist_entry));
> +}
> +
> +static void block_entry_free(void *he)
> +{
> + struct block_info *bi = ((struct hist_entry *)he)->block_info;
> +
> + block_info__put(bi);
> + free(he);
> +}
so if we carry block_info in 'struct hist_entry' we don't need
to use our own allocation in the 2nd level hist entries.. just
for the first level to carry the new 'struct block_hists'
the block_info should be released in hist_entry__delete then,
same as for other *info pointers
the rest of the patchset looks ok to me
thanks,
jirka
> +
> +struct hist_entry_ops block_entry_ops = {
> + .new = block_entry_zalloc,
> + .free = block_entry_free,
> +};
> +
> +static int process_block_per_sym(struct hist_entry *he)
> +{
> + struct annotation *notes;
> + struct cyc_hist *ch;
> + struct block_hist *bh;
> +
> + if (!he->ms.map || !he->ms.sym)
> + return 0;
> +
> + notes = symbol__annotation(he->ms.sym);
> + if (!notes || !notes->src || !notes->src->cycles_hist)
> + return 0;
> +
> + bh = container_of(he, struct block_hist, he);
> + init_block_hist(bh);
> +
> + ch = notes->src->cycles_hist;
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < symbol__size(he->ms.sym); i++) {
> + if (ch[i].num_aggr) {
> + struct block_info *bi;
> + struct hist_entry *he_block;
> +
> + bi = block_info__new();
> + if (!bi)
> + return -1;
> +
> + init_block_info(bi, he->ms.sym, &ch[i], i);
> + he_block = hists__add_entry_block(&bh->block_hists,
> + &block_entry_ops,
> + &dummy_al, bi);
> + if (!he_block) {
> + block_info__put(bi);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
SNIP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-20 14:36 [PATCH v4 0/7] perf diff: diff cycles at basic block level Jin Yao
2019-06-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] perf util: Create block_info structure Jin Yao
2019-06-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] perf util: Add block_info in hist_entry Jin Yao
2019-06-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] perf diff: Check if all data files with branch stacks Jin Yao
2019-06-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] perf diff: Use hists to manage basic blocks per symbol Jin Yao
2019-06-24 7:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-06-24 14:49 ` Jin, Yao
2019-06-25 8:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-06-25 9:11 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-06-26 0:57 ` Jin, Yao
2019-06-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] perf diff: Link same basic blocks among different data Jin Yao
2019-06-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] perf diff: Print the basic block cycles diff Jin Yao
2019-06-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] perf diff: Documentation -c cycles option Jin Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190625091134.GD9574@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox