Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] sched/isolation: Prefer housekeeping cpu in local node

[Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> [2019-06-28 08:43:13]:


>  
> +/*
> + * sched_numa_find_closest() - given the NUMA topology, find the cpu
> + *                             closest to @cpu from @cpumask.
> + * cpumask: cpumask to find a cpu from
> + * cpu: cpu to be close to
> + *
> + * returns: cpu, or >= nr_cpu_ids when nothing found (or !NUMA).

One nit:
I dont see sched_numa_find_closest returning anything greater than
nr_cpu_ids. So 's/>= //' for the above comment.

> + */
> +int sched_numa_find_closest(const struct cpumask *cpus, int cpu)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +	int i, j = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < sched_domains_numa_levels; i++) {
> +		cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpus, sched_domains_numa_masks[i][j]);
> +		if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> +			return cpu;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +	return nr_cpu_ids;
> +}
> +

Should we have a static function for sched_numa_find_closest instead of
having #ifdef in the function?

>  static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
>  {
>  	struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl;

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju