public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	longman@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/30] locking/lockdep: Pass lock chain from validate_chain() to check_prev_add()
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:15:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190628091528.17059-5-duyuyang@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628091528.17059-1-duyuyang@gmail.com>

The pointer of lock chains is passed all the way from validate_chain()
to check_prev_add(). This is aimed for a later effort to associate lock
chains to lock dependencies.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index d545b6c..f171c6e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2370,7 +2370,8 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
  */
 static int
 check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
-	       struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct lock_trace *trace)
+	       struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct lock_trace *trace,
+	       struct lock_chain *chain)
 {
 	struct lock_list *entry;
 	int ret;
@@ -2475,7 +2476,8 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
  * the end of this context's lock-chain - whichever comes first.
  */
 static int
-check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
+check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
+		struct lock_chain *chain)
 {
 	struct lock_trace trace = { .nr_entries = 0 };
 	int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
@@ -2506,7 +2508,7 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
 		 */
 		if (hlock->read != 2 && hlock->check) {
 			int ret = check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance,
-						 &trace);
+						 &trace, chain);
 			if (!ret)
 				return 0;
 
@@ -2846,6 +2848,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
 			  struct held_lock *hlock,
 			  int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
+	struct lock_chain *chain;
 	/*
 	 * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
 	 * does not add new dependencies, because trylock can be done
@@ -2857,7 +2860,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
 	 * graph_lock for us)
 	 */
 	if (!hlock->trylock && hlock->check &&
-	    lookup_chain_cache_add(curr, hlock, chain_key)) {
+	    (chain = lookup_chain_cache_add(curr, hlock, chain_key))) {
 		/*
 		 * Check whether last held lock:
 		 *
@@ -2892,7 +2895,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
 		 * of the chain, and if it's not a secondary read-lock:
 		 */
 		if (!chain_head && ret != 2) {
-			if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock))
+			if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock, chain))
 				return 0;
 		}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-28  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28  9:14 [PATCH v3 00/30] Support recursive-read lock deadlock detection Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/30] locking/lockdep: Rename deadlock check functions Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/30] locking/lockdep: Change return type of add_chain_cache() Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/30] locking/lockdep: Change return type of lookup_chain_cache_add() Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/30] locking/lockdep: Add lock chain list_head field in struct lock_list and lock_chain Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/30] locking/lockdep: Update comments in struct lock_list and held_lock Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/30] locking/lockdep: Remove indirect dependency redundancy check Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/30] locking/lockdep: Skip checks if direct dependency is already present Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/30] locking/lockdep: Remove chain_head argument in validate_chain() Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 10/30] locking/lockdep: Remove useless lock type assignment Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 11/30] locking/lockdep: Specify the depth of current lock stack in lookup_chain_cache_add() Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 12/30] locking/lockdep: Treat every lock dependency as in a new lock chain Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 13/30] locking/lockdep: Combine lock_lists in struct lock_class into an array Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 14/30] locking/lockdep: Consolidate forward and backward lock_lists into one Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 15/30] locking/lockdep: Add lock chains to direct lock dependency graph Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 16/30] locking/lockdep: Use lock type enum to explicitly specify read or write locks Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 17/30] locking/lockdep: Add read-write type for a lock dependency Yuyang Du
2019-07-10  5:18   ` Boqun Feng
2019-07-11  5:02     ` Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 18/30] locking/lockdep: Add helper functions to operate on the searched path Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 19/30] locking/lockdep: Update direct dependency's read-write type if it exists Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 20/30] locking/lockdep: Introduce chain_hlocks_type for held lock's read-write type Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 21/30] locking/lockdep: Hash held lock's read-write type into chain key Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 22/30] locking/lockdep: Adjust BFS algorithm to support multiple matches Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 23/30] locking/lockdep: Define the two task model for lockdep checks formally Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 24/30] locking/lockdep: Introduce mark_lock_unaccessed() Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 25/30] locking/lockdep: Add nest lock type Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 26/30] locking/lockdep: Add lock exclusiveness table Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 27/30] locking/lockdep: Support read-write lock's deadlock detection Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 28/30] locking/lockdep: Adjust selftest case for recursive read lock Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 29/30] locking/lockdep: Add more lockdep selftest cases Yuyang Du
2019-06-28  9:15 ` [PATCH v3 30/30] locking/lockdep: Remove irq-safe to irq-unsafe read check Yuyang Du
2019-07-10  5:30   ` Boqun Feng
2019-07-10  6:30     ` Yuyang Du
2019-07-10  1:54 ` [PATCH v3 00/30] Support recursive-read lock deadlock detection Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190628091528.17059-5-duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --to=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox