Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] printk-rb: add a new printk ringbuffer implementation

Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-01T14:11:55Z

On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:39:35PM +0200, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2019-06-28, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > (Note that the qspinlock has a queue not unlike this, but that again
> > doesn't have to bother with NMIs)
>
> Thank you for pointing this out! I will look to qspinlock for some
> naming guidelines.

Fair warning: qspinlock might hurt your brain; but if you do look and
are unsure; let me know and I'll try and improve its comments.