From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Do not rely on errno values for precise_ip fallback
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:52:18 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190703145218.GA24332@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190703080949.10356-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Em Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:09:49AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> Konstantin reported problem with default perf record command,
> which fails on some AMD servers, because of the default maximum
> precise config.
>
> The current fallback mechanism counts on getting ENOTSUP errno for
> precise_ip fails, but that's not the case on some AMD servers.
>
> We can fix this by removing the errno check completely, because the
> precise_ip fallback is separated. We can just try (if requested by
> evsel->precise_max) all possible precise_ip, and if one succeeds we
> win, if not, we continue with standard fallback.
Thanks, applied.
Simple test shows that behaviour continues the same on x86_64.
- Arnaldo
> Reported-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru>
> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
> Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 5ab31a4a658d..7fb4ae82f34c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1800,14 +1800,8 @@ static int perf_event_open(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> if (fd >= 0)
> break;
>
> - /*
> - * Do quick precise_ip fallback if:
> - * - there is precise_ip set in perf_event_attr
> - * - maximum precise is requested
> - * - sys_perf_event_open failed with ENOTSUP error,
> - * which is associated with wrong precise_ip
> - */
> - if (!precise_ip || !evsel->precise_max || (errno != ENOTSUP))
> + /* Do not try less precise if not requested. */
> + if (!evsel->precise_max)
> break;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.21.0
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-03 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-03 8:09 [PATCH] perf tools: Do not rely on errno values for precise_ip fallback Jiri Olsa
2019-07-03 14:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2019-07-09 11:30 ` [tip:perf/core] perf evsel: " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190703145218.GA24332@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=Hi-Angel@yandex.ru \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=quentin.monnet@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox