From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19487C0650E for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B19218A0 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:20:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1562170844; bh=QZTPaJThXyCvilVBec9jdvthL4N/0KWr9NeInDRs86I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=KLrgVMqkEdSEw9ZXfarpdmI7zFUsWzpc64QAaEEubnPC/s8MqKSircZnTP21lWjfG +EbOvdMJpJwxdtq+cSXKsulJ7f1N/pMWegziJs/fl0y/l+r/Pv8Nb37tm7ew5aEX8J NskwCmi8Vx1yWll0RjFQ4AfRudALc0q/8grmAHfc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726928AbfGCQUm (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:20:42 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34772 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726823AbfGCQUm (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:20:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8BEF21882; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:20:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1562170841; bh=QZTPaJThXyCvilVBec9jdvthL4N/0KWr9NeInDRs86I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tfpGpXQqZjJsZny78dtBwtSQTqC1dHZjhi8Hrif6Avo5MfSEozLRGTIE9B1x64R8i mew4YG2xBl8Wwk5N+AtUJuHbjQjlAlDWM1cldJIKfPMs2rg/bSKWtvfzs14BCplYCF /C18P3Lbt0894GMMkrWmnwOu66TSWAhruJauTaH0= Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:20:38 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Yue Hu Cc: gaoxiang25@huawei.com, yuchao0@huawei.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, huyue2@yulong.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] staging: erofs: remove unsupported ->datamode check in fill_inline_data() Message-ID: <20190703162038.GA31307@kroah.com> References: <20190702025601.7976-1-zbestahu@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190702025601.7976-1-zbestahu@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:56:01AM +0800, Yue Hu wrote: > From: Yue Hu > > Already check if ->datamode is supported in read_inode(), no need to check > again in the next fill_inline_data() only called by fill_inode(). > > Signed-off-by: Yue Hu > Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu > --- > no change > > drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) This is already in my tree, right? confused, greg k-h