From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/cio: introduce driver_override on the css bus
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:55:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190703165506.53d3911c.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624091740.1d9c6c1d.cohuck@redhat.com>
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:17:40 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:19:36 +0200 (CEST)
> Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > Sometimes, we want to control which of the matching drivers
> > > binds to a subchannel device (e.g. for subchannels we want to
> > > handle via vfio-ccw).
> > >
> > > For pci devices, a mechanism to do so has been introduced in
> > > 782a985d7af2 ("PCI: Introduce new device binding path using
> > > pci_dev.driver_override"). It makes sense to introduce the
> > > driver_override attribute for subchannel devices as well, so
> > > that we can easily extend the 'driverctl' tool (which makes
> > > use of the driver_override attribute for pci).
> > >
> > > Note that unlike pci we still require a driver override to
> > > match the subchannel type; matching more than one subchannel
> > > type is probably not useful anyway.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Should I take that via our git tree or do you have other patches depending
> > on this one?
> >
>
> No, this patch is stand-alone; everything else is happening in user
> space, so taking it via your tree would be great. Thanks!
Friendly ping (I don't see it on s390/features yet; or is this going
via some other path?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-03 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 11:08 [PATCH] s390/cio: introduce driver_override on the css bus Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 9:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 13:37 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-21 14:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 16:19 ` Sebastian Ott
2019-06-24 7:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-07-03 14:55 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-07-03 15:09 ` Vasily Gorbik
2019-07-03 15:28 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190703165506.53d3911c.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox