Re: [PATCH 01/12 v2] Platform: add a dev_groups pointer to struct platform_driver

Dmitry Torokhov
2019-07-25T19:13:35Z

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:04:43PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:02:03PM -0500, Richard Gong wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On 7/25/19 8:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 07:38:57AM +0300, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 08:52:20PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 10:39:38AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 10:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 10:04:39AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:32 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > > > > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:17:22PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 5:15 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > > > > > > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Platform drivers like to add sysfs groups to their device, but right now
> > > > > > > > > > > they have to do it "by hand". The driver core should handle this for
> > > > > > > > > > > them, but there is no way to get to the bus-default attribute groups as
> > > > > > > > > > > all platform devices are "special and unique" one-off drivers/devices.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > To combat this, add a dev_groups pointer to platform_driver which allows
> > > > > > > > > > > a platform driver to set up a list of default attributes that will be
> > > > > > > > > > > properly created and removed by the platform driver core when a probe()
> > > > > > > > > > > function is successful and removed right before the device is unbound.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Why is this limited to platform bus? Drivers for other buses also
> > > > > > > > > > often want to augment list of their attributes during probe(). I'd
> > > > > > > > > > move it to generic probe handling.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This is not limited to the platform at all, the driver core supports
> > > > > > > > > this for any bus type today, but it's then up to the bus-specific code
> > > > > > > > > to pass that on to the driver core. That's usually set for the
> > > > > > > > > bus-specific attributes that they want exposed for all devices of that
> > > > > > > > > bus type (see the bus_groups, dev_groups, and drv_groups pointers in
> > > > > > > > > struct bus_type).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For the platform devices, the problem is that this is something that the
> > > > > > > > > individual drivers want after they bind to the device. And as all
> > > > > > > > > platform devices are "different" they can't be a "common" set of
> > > > > > > > > attributes, so they need to be created after the device is bound to the
> > > > > > > > > driver.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I believe that your assertion that only platform devices want to
> > > > > > > > install custom attributes is incorrect.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that only platform drivers want to do
> > > > > > > this, as you say, many other drivers do as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Drivers for devices attached
> > > > > > > > to serio, i2c, USB, spi, etc, etc, all have additional attributes:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > dtor@dtor-ws:~/kernel/work (master *)$ grep -l '\(i2c\|usb\|spi\)'
> > > > > > > > `git grep -l '\(device_add_group\|sysfs_create_group\)' -- drivers` |
> > > > > > > > wc -l
> > > > > > > > 170
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am pretty sure some of this count is false positives, but majority
> > > > > > > > is actually proper hits.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah, I know, we need to add this type of functionality to those busses
> > > > > > > as well. I don't see a way of doing it other than this bus-by-bus
> > > > > > > conversion, do you?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can't you push the **dev_groups from platform driver down to the
> > > > > > generic driver structure and handle them in driver_sysfs_add()?
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the delay, got busy with the merge window...
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, no, we can't call this then, because driver_sysfs_add() is
> > > > > called before probe() is called. So if probe() fails, we don't bind the
> > > > > device to the driver. We also should not be creating sysfs files for a
> > > > > driver that has not had probe() called yet, as internal structures will
> > > > > not be set up at that time.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, yes, I got confused by the fact that driver_sysfs_remove is called
> > > > early. Anyway, I think you want something like this:
> > >
> > > Ah, nice, this looks good. Let me try this and see how it goes...
> > >
> >
> > I tried Dmitry's patch on Intel Stratix10 platform and it works.
> >
> > I added one minor change on the top of Dmitry's patch, since I think we need
> > add one additional check prior to device_add_groups(). To align with
> > Dmitry's patch, I also change my code to use the new dev_groups pointer in
> > the struct of device_driver.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> > My changes are below,
>
> <snip>
>
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c
> > @@ -391,9 +391,9 @@ static int stratix10_rsu_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > static struct platform_driver stratix10_rsu_driver = {
> > .probe = stratix10_rsu_probe,
> > .remove = stratix10_rsu_remove,
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "stratix10-rsu",
> > + .dev_groups = rsu_groups,
>
> I'd prefer to leave the dev_groups in the platform driver code, as no
> one should have to do this crazy "sub structure definition" that
> platform drivers seem to love to do.

Heh.

dtor@penguin:~/kernel/work $ git grep -A15 "static struct spi_driver" --
drivers/ | grep "\.driver.*=" | wc -l
272

You will find the similar counts for i2c, and other buses, mostly
because we need to specify driver name, OF/ACPI match tables, and
pointer to PM ops.

So please just keep it in the generic driver structure.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry