From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gnault@redhat.com, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch "netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: accept duplicate fragments again" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:03:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190705160318.GA632@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190705140421.28F82218D2@mail.kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:04:20AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
> netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: accept duplicate fragments again
>
> to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at:
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>
> The filename of the patch is:
> netfilter-ipv6-nf_defrag-accept-duplicate-fragments-.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory.
>
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>
>
>
> commit 447d05e723b06f8aa1a9cba0f7b4c0029924663c
> Author: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu Jun 6 18:04:00 2019 +0200
>
> netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: accept duplicate fragments again
>
> [ Upstream commit 8a3dca632538c550930ce8bafa8c906b130d35cf ]
>
> When fixing the skb leak introduced by the conversion to rbtree, I
> forgot about the special case of duplicate fragments. The condition
> under the 'insert_error' label isn't effective anymore as
> nf_ct_frg6_gather() doesn't override the returned value anymore. So
> duplicate fragments now get NF_DROP verdict.
>
> To accept duplicate fragments again, handle them specially as soon as
> inet_frag_queue_insert() reports them. Return -EINPROGRESS which will
> translate to NF_STOLEN verdict, like any accepted fragment. However,
> such packets don't carry any new information and aren't queued, so we
> just drop them immediately.
>
> Fixes: a0d56cb911ca ("netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: fix leakage of unqueued fragments")
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Why not add this to 5.1.y as well?
thanks,
greg k-h
parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-05 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20190705140421.28F82218D2@mail.kernel.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190705160318.GA632@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox