public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Bo Zhang <bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Segregate tx channel handling and prepare to add rx
Date: Mon,  8 Jul 2019 16:47:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190708154730.16643-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708154730.16643-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

The transmit(Tx) channels are specified as the first entry and the
receive(Rx) channels are the second entry as per the device tree
bindings. Since we currently just support Tx, index 0 is hardcoded at
all required callsites.

In order to prepare for adding Rx support, let's remove those hardcoded
index and add boolean parameter to identify Tx/Rx channels when setting
them up.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index 0bd2af0a008f..f7fb6d5bfc64 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct scmi_chan_info {
  * @version: SCMI revision information containing protocol version,
  *	implementation version and (sub-)vendor identification.
  * @minfo: Message info
- * @tx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to channel info pointer
+ * @tx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to Tx channel info pointer
  * @protocols_imp: List of protocols implemented, currently maximum of
  *	MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP elements allocated by the base protocol
  * @node: List head
@@ -640,22 +640,26 @@ static int scmi_xfer_info_init(struct scmi_info *sinfo)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int scmi_mailbox_check(struct device_node *np)
+static int scmi_mailbox_check(struct device_node *np, int idx)
 {
-	return of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells", 0, NULL);
+	return of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells",
+					  idx, NULL);
 }
 
-static inline int
-scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev, int prot_id)
+static int scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev,
+				int prot_id, bool tx)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret, idx;
 	struct resource res;
 	resource_size_t size;
 	struct device_node *shmem, *np = dev->of_node;
 	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
 	struct mbox_client *cl;
 
-	if (scmi_mailbox_check(np)) {
+	/* Transmit channel is first entry i.e. index 0 */
+	idx = tx ? 0 : 1;
+
+	if (scmi_mailbox_check(np, idx)) {
 		cinfo = idr_find(&info->tx_idr, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE);
 		goto idr_alloc;
 	}
@@ -669,11 +673,11 @@ scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev, int prot_id)
 	cl = &cinfo->cl;
 	cl->dev = dev;
 	cl->rx_callback = scmi_rx_callback;
-	cl->tx_prepare = scmi_tx_prepare;
+	cl->tx_prepare = tx ? scmi_tx_prepare : NULL;
 	cl->tx_block = false;
-	cl->knows_txdone = true;
+	cl->knows_txdone = tx;
 
-	shmem = of_parse_phandle(np, "shmem", 0);
+	shmem = of_parse_phandle(np, "shmem", idx);
 	ret = of_address_to_resource(shmem, 0, &res);
 	of_node_put(shmem);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -688,8 +692,7 @@ scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev, int prot_id)
 		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
 	}
 
-	/* Transmit channel is first entry i.e. index 0 */
-	cinfo->chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, 0);
+	cinfo->chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, idx);
 	if (IS_ERR(cinfo->chan)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(cinfo->chan);
 		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
@@ -721,7 +724,7 @@ scmi_create_protocol_device(struct device_node *np, struct scmi_info *info,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (scmi_mbox_chan_setup(info, &sdev->dev, prot_id)) {
+	if (scmi_mbox_chan_setup(info, &sdev->dev, prot_id, true)) {
 		dev_err(&sdev->dev, "failed to setup transport\n");
 		scmi_device_destroy(sdev);
 		return;
@@ -741,7 +744,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device_node *child, *np = dev->of_node;
 
 	/* Only mailbox method supported, check for the presence of one */
-	if (scmi_mailbox_check(np)) {
+	if (scmi_mailbox_check(np, 0)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "no mailbox found in %pOF\n", np);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -769,7 +772,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	handle->dev = info->dev;
 	handle->version = &info->version;
 
-	ret = scmi_mbox_chan_setup(info, dev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE);
+	ret = scmi_mbox_chan_setup(info, dev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE, true);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-08 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 15:47 [PATCH 00/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for Rx, async commands and delayed response Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Reorder some functions to avoid forward declarations Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-07-18 21:23   ` [PATCH 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Segregate tx channel handling and prepare to add rx Jim Quinlan
2019-07-19 10:26     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive channel support for notifications Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Separate out tx buffer handling and prepare to add rx Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications Sudeep Holla
2019-07-18 21:24   ` Jim Quinlan
     [not found]   ` <CA+-6iNz26xUyrzVSbWA+jwEfj3BC8k8KNCg2SreDK7mfWsbAWg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-07-19 10:29     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add mechanism to unpack message headers Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for asynchronous commands and delayed response Sudeep Holla
2019-07-18 21:38   ` Jim Quinlan
2019-07-19 11:03     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-19 20:16       ` Jim Quinlan
2019-07-22 13:08         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 08/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop async flag in sensor_ops->reading_get Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 16:05   ` Guenter Roeck
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 09/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add asynchronous sensor read if it supports Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop config flag in clk_ops->rate_set Sudeep Holla
2019-07-22 21:30   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Use asynchronous CLOCK_RATE_SET when possible Sudeep Holla
2019-07-22 21:29   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-23 10:59     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190708154730.16643-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox