From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
Bo Zhang <bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com>,
Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Segregate tx channel handling and prepare to add rx
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:47:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190708154730.16643-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708154730.16643-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The transmit(Tx) channels are specified as the first entry and the
receive(Rx) channels are the second entry as per the device tree
bindings. Since we currently just support Tx, index 0 is hardcoded at
all required callsites.
In order to prepare for adding Rx support, let's remove those hardcoded
index and add boolean parameter to identify Tx/Rx channels when setting
them up.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index 0bd2af0a008f..f7fb6d5bfc64 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct scmi_chan_info {
* @version: SCMI revision information containing protocol version,
* implementation version and (sub-)vendor identification.
* @minfo: Message info
- * @tx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to channel info pointer
+ * @tx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to Tx channel info pointer
* @protocols_imp: List of protocols implemented, currently maximum of
* MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP elements allocated by the base protocol
* @node: List head
@@ -640,22 +640,26 @@ static int scmi_xfer_info_init(struct scmi_info *sinfo)
return 0;
}
-static int scmi_mailbox_check(struct device_node *np)
+static int scmi_mailbox_check(struct device_node *np, int idx)
{
- return of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells", 0, NULL);
+ return of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells",
+ idx, NULL);
}
-static inline int
-scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev, int prot_id)
+static int scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev,
+ int prot_id, bool tx)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret, idx;
struct resource res;
resource_size_t size;
struct device_node *shmem, *np = dev->of_node;
struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
struct mbox_client *cl;
- if (scmi_mailbox_check(np)) {
+ /* Transmit channel is first entry i.e. index 0 */
+ idx = tx ? 0 : 1;
+
+ if (scmi_mailbox_check(np, idx)) {
cinfo = idr_find(&info->tx_idr, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE);
goto idr_alloc;
}
@@ -669,11 +673,11 @@ scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev, int prot_id)
cl = &cinfo->cl;
cl->dev = dev;
cl->rx_callback = scmi_rx_callback;
- cl->tx_prepare = scmi_tx_prepare;
+ cl->tx_prepare = tx ? scmi_tx_prepare : NULL;
cl->tx_block = false;
- cl->knows_txdone = true;
+ cl->knows_txdone = tx;
- shmem = of_parse_phandle(np, "shmem", 0);
+ shmem = of_parse_phandle(np, "shmem", idx);
ret = of_address_to_resource(shmem, 0, &res);
of_node_put(shmem);
if (ret) {
@@ -688,8 +692,7 @@ scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device *dev, int prot_id)
return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
}
- /* Transmit channel is first entry i.e. index 0 */
- cinfo->chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, 0);
+ cinfo->chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, idx);
if (IS_ERR(cinfo->chan)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(cinfo->chan);
if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
@@ -721,7 +724,7 @@ scmi_create_protocol_device(struct device_node *np, struct scmi_info *info,
return;
}
- if (scmi_mbox_chan_setup(info, &sdev->dev, prot_id)) {
+ if (scmi_mbox_chan_setup(info, &sdev->dev, prot_id, true)) {
dev_err(&sdev->dev, "failed to setup transport\n");
scmi_device_destroy(sdev);
return;
@@ -741,7 +744,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device_node *child, *np = dev->of_node;
/* Only mailbox method supported, check for the presence of one */
- if (scmi_mailbox_check(np)) {
+ if (scmi_mailbox_check(np, 0)) {
dev_err(dev, "no mailbox found in %pOF\n", np);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -769,7 +772,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
handle->dev = info->dev;
handle->version = &info->version;
- ret = scmi_mbox_chan_setup(info, dev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE);
+ ret = scmi_mbox_chan_setup(info, dev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-08 15:47 [PATCH 00/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for Rx, async commands and delayed response Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Reorder some functions to avoid forward declarations Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-07-18 21:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Segregate tx channel handling and prepare to add rx Jim Quinlan
2019-07-19 10:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive channel support for notifications Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Separate out tx buffer handling and prepare to add rx Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications Sudeep Holla
2019-07-18 21:24 ` Jim Quinlan
[not found] ` <CA+-6iNz26xUyrzVSbWA+jwEfj3BC8k8KNCg2SreDK7mfWsbAWg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-07-19 10:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add mechanism to unpack message headers Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for asynchronous commands and delayed response Sudeep Holla
2019-07-18 21:38 ` Jim Quinlan
2019-07-19 11:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-19 20:16 ` Jim Quinlan
2019-07-22 13:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 08/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop async flag in sensor_ops->reading_get Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 16:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 09/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add asynchronous sensor read if it supports Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop config flag in clk_ops->rate_set Sudeep Holla
2019-07-22 21:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Use asynchronous CLOCK_RATE_SET when possible Sudeep Holla
2019-07-22 21:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-23 10:59 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190708154730.16643-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox