From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C51C606CF for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7F1214AF for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732124AbfGHUhf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:37:35 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:36809 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728778AbfGHUhf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:37:35 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2F7D768B05; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 22:37:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 22:37:33 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Guenter Roeck , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Stephen Rothwell , linux-m68k , Greg Ungerer Subject: Re: m68k build failures in -next: undefined reference to `arch_dma_prep_coherent' Message-ID: <20190708203733.GA15607@lst.de> References: <20190708170647.GA12313@roeck-us.net> <20190708194516.GA18304@roeck-us.net> <20190708202226.GA15167@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:36:05PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Note that the build failure is more subtle: both m5307c3_defconfig and > m5475evb_defconfig build fine in m68k/for-linus, but fail in > next-20190708. So it fails when combined with other changes, going > in through a different tree (the DMA tree?). Yes, the dma tree adds the stub for the symbol and adds code relying on that.