public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Fix perf-hooks test for sanitizers
@ 2019-07-08 21:59 Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo
  2019-07-09  0:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo @ 2019-07-08 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, acme, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, namhyung,
	songliubraving, mbd
  Cc: linux-kernel, irogers, eranian, Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo

The perf-hooks test fails with Address Sanitizer and Memory
Sanitizer builds because it purposefully generates a segfault.
Checking if these sanitizers are active when running this test
will allow the perf-hooks test to pass.

This can be replicated by running (from the tip directory):

make -C tools/perf USE_CLANG=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address \
-DADDRESS_SANITIZER=1"

then running tools/perf/perf test 55

Fix past to pass:
The raised signal was changed from SIGSEGV to SIGILL to get the test 
to pass on our local machines which use clang 4.

Signed-off-by: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@google.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c b/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
index a693bcf017ea..3f5f4b28cf01 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
@@ -7,7 +7,14 @@
 #include "util.h"
 #include "perf-hooks.h"
 
-static void sigsegv_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
+#if defined(ADDRESS_SANITIZER) || defined(MEMORY_SANITIZER) || \
+defined(THREAD_SANITIZER) || defined(SAFESTACK_SANITIZER)
+#define USE_SIGNAL 1
+#else
+#define USE_SIGNAL 0
+#endif
+
+static void signal_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
 {
 	pr_debug("SIGSEGV is observed as expected, try to recover.\n");
 	perf_hooks__recover();
@@ -25,6 +32,9 @@ static void the_hook(void *_hook_flags)
 	*hook_flags = 1234;
 
 	/* Generate a segfault, test perf_hooks__recover */
+#if USE_SIGNAL
+	raise(SIGILL);
+#endif
 	*p = 0;
 }
 
@@ -32,7 +42,7 @@ int test__perf_hooks(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unuse
 {
 	int hook_flags = 0;
 
-	signal(SIGSEGV, sigsegv_handler);
+	signal(USE_SIGNAL ? SIGILL : SIGSEGV, signal_handler);
 	perf_hooks__set_hook("test", the_hook, &hook_flags);
 	perf_hooks__invoke_test();
 
-- 
2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix perf-hooks test for sanitizers
  2019-07-08 21:59 [PATCH] Fix perf-hooks test for sanitizers Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo
@ 2019-07-09  0:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2019-07-09  0:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo
  Cc: peterz, mingo, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, namhyung,
	songliubraving, mbd, linux-kernel, irogers, eranian

Em Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 02:59:28PM -0700, Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo escreveu:
> The perf-hooks test fails with Address Sanitizer and Memory
> Sanitizer builds because it purposefully generates a segfault.
> Checking if these sanitizers are active when running this test
> will allow the perf-hooks test to pass.
> 
> This can be replicated by running (from the tip directory):
> 
> make -C tools/perf USE_CLANG=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address \
> -DADDRESS_SANITIZER=1"
> 
> then running tools/perf/perf test 55
> 
> Fix past to pass:
> The raised signal was changed from SIGSEGV to SIGILL to get the test 
> to pass on our local machines which use clang 4.

We still need a little bit more info, because I couldn't find libasan in
the clang that ships with fedora:30 and not on the selection used to
build from the clang repo in my machine:

[acme@quaco perf]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/perf
[acme@quaco perf]$ make -C tools/perf CC=clang EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address -DADDRESS_SANITIZER=1" O=/tmp/build/perf
make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf'
  BUILD:   Doing 'make -j8' parallel build
  HOSTCC   /tmp/build/perf/fixdep.o
  HOSTLD   /tmp/build/perf/fixdep-in.o
  LINK     /tmp/build/perf/fixdep

Auto-detecting system features:
...                         dwarf: [ OFF ]
...            dwarf_getlocations: [ OFF ]
...                         glibc: [ OFF ]
...                          gtk2: [ OFF ]
...                      libaudit: [ OFF ]
...                        libbfd: [ OFF ]
...                        libelf: [ OFF ]
...                       libnuma: [ OFF ]
...        numa_num_possible_cpus: [ OFF ]
...                       libperl: [ OFF ]
...                     libpython: [ OFF ]
...                     libcrypto: [ OFF ]
...                     libunwind: [ OFF ]
...            libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ OFF ]
...                          zlib: [ OFF ]
...                          lzma: [ OFF ]
...                     get_cpuid: [ OFF ]
...                           bpf: [ OFF ]
...                        libaio: [ OFF ]
...                       libzstd: [ OFF ]
...        disassembler-four-args: [ OFF ]

Makefile.config:368: *** No gnu/libc-version.h found, please install glibc-dev[el].  Stop.
make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:219: sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf'
[acme@quaco perf]$ cat /tmp/build/perf/feature/test-glibc.make.output
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find /opt/llvm/lib/clang/9.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a: No such file or directory
clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
[acme@quaco perf]$

So I'll check and select that to get to the set of instructions needed
to use this.

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c b/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
> index a693bcf017ea..3f5f4b28cf01 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,14 @@
>  #include "util.h"
>  #include "perf-hooks.h"
>  
> -static void sigsegv_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
> +#if defined(ADDRESS_SANITIZER) || defined(MEMORY_SANITIZER) || \
> +defined(THREAD_SANITIZER) || defined(SAFESTACK_SANITIZER)
> +#define USE_SIGNAL 1
> +#else
> +#define USE_SIGNAL 0
> +#endif
> +
> +static void signal_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
>  {
>  	pr_debug("SIGSEGV is observed as expected, try to recover.\n");
>  	perf_hooks__recover();
> @@ -25,6 +32,9 @@ static void the_hook(void *_hook_flags)
>  	*hook_flags = 1234;
>  
>  	/* Generate a segfault, test perf_hooks__recover */
> +#if USE_SIGNAL
> +	raise(SIGILL);
> +#endif
>  	*p = 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -32,7 +42,7 @@ int test__perf_hooks(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unuse
>  {
>  	int hook_flags = 0;
>  
> -	signal(SIGSEGV, sigsegv_handler);
> +	signal(USE_SIGNAL ? SIGILL : SIGSEGV, signal_handler);
>  	perf_hooks__set_hook("test", the_hook, &hook_flags);
>  	perf_hooks__invoke_test();
>  
> -- 
> 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog

-- 

- Arnaldo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-09  0:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-08 21:59 [PATCH] Fix perf-hooks test for sanitizers Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo
2019-07-09  0:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox