public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Fix perf-hooks test for sanitizers
@ 2019-07-08 21:59 Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo
  2019-07-09  0:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo @ 2019-07-08 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, acme, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, namhyung,
	songliubraving, mbd
  Cc: linux-kernel, irogers, eranian, Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo

The perf-hooks test fails with Address Sanitizer and Memory
Sanitizer builds because it purposefully generates a segfault.
Checking if these sanitizers are active when running this test
will allow the perf-hooks test to pass.

This can be replicated by running (from the tip directory):

make -C tools/perf USE_CLANG=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address \
-DADDRESS_SANITIZER=1"

then running tools/perf/perf test 55

Fix past to pass:
The raised signal was changed from SIGSEGV to SIGILL to get the test 
to pass on our local machines which use clang 4.

Signed-off-by: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@google.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c b/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
index a693bcf017ea..3f5f4b28cf01 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c
@@ -7,7 +7,14 @@
 #include "util.h"
 #include "perf-hooks.h"
 
-static void sigsegv_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
+#if defined(ADDRESS_SANITIZER) || defined(MEMORY_SANITIZER) || \
+defined(THREAD_SANITIZER) || defined(SAFESTACK_SANITIZER)
+#define USE_SIGNAL 1
+#else
+#define USE_SIGNAL 0
+#endif
+
+static void signal_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
 {
 	pr_debug("SIGSEGV is observed as expected, try to recover.\n");
 	perf_hooks__recover();
@@ -25,6 +32,9 @@ static void the_hook(void *_hook_flags)
 	*hook_flags = 1234;
 
 	/* Generate a segfault, test perf_hooks__recover */
+#if USE_SIGNAL
+	raise(SIGILL);
+#endif
 	*p = 0;
 }
 
@@ -32,7 +42,7 @@ int test__perf_hooks(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unuse
 {
 	int hook_flags = 0;
 
-	signal(SIGSEGV, sigsegv_handler);
+	signal(USE_SIGNAL ? SIGILL : SIGSEGV, signal_handler);
 	perf_hooks__set_hook("test", the_hook, &hook_flags);
 	perf_hooks__invoke_test();
 
-- 
2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-09  0:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-08 21:59 [PATCH] Fix perf-hooks test for sanitizers Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo
2019-07-09  0:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox