From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31B0C76188 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8281720880 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732319AbfGPMZL (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 08:25:11 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:41320 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726593AbfGPMZL (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 08:25:11 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 58470227A81; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:25:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:25:08 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Keith Busch , Paul Pawlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme: Retrieve the required IO queue entry size from the controller Message-ID: <20190716122508.GA3304@lst.de> References: <20190716004649.17799-1-benh@kernel.crashing.org> <20190716004649.17799-2-benh@kernel.crashing.org> <20190716060430.GB29414@lst.de> <20190716093301.GA32562@lst.de> <20190716120547.GA2388@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:17:56PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > If we're going to do that, then I can move it back to pci.c and leave > core.c alone then I suppose. Up to you. I'm just doing that for fun, no > beef in that game :-) let me know how you want it. Sounds safest to me.