Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] x86: tsc: add tsc to art helpers

Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-15T14:16:32Z

Felipe,

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> > So some information what those interfaces are used for and why they are
> > needed would be really helpful.
>
> Okay, I have some more details about this. The TGPIO device itself uses
> ART since TSC is not directly available to anything other than the
> CPU. The 'problem' here is that reading ART incurs extra latency which
> we would like to avoid. Therefore, we use TSC and scale it to
> nanoseconds which, would be the same as ART to ns.

Fine. But that's not really correct:

TSC = art_to_tsc_offset + ART * scale;

> >> +void get_tsc_ns(struct system_counterval_t *tsc_counterval, u64 *tsc_ns)

Why is this not returning the result instead of having that pointer
indirection?

> >> +{
> >> + u64 tmp, res, rem;
> >> + u64 cycles;
> >> +
> >> + tsc_counterval->cycles = clocksource_tsc.read(NULL);
> >> + cycles = tsc_counterval->cycles;
> >> + tsc_counterval->cs = art_related_clocksource;

So this does more than returning the TSC time converted to nanoseconds. The
function name should reflect this. Plus both functions want kernel-doc
explaining what they do.

> >> + rem = do_div(cycles, tsc_khz);
> >> +
> >> + res = cycles * USEC_PER_SEC;
> >> + tmp = rem * USEC_PER_SEC;
> >> +
> >> + do_div(tmp, tsc_khz);
> >> + res += tmp;
> >> +
> >> + *tsc_ns = res;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_tsc_ns);
> >> +
> >> +u64 get_art_ns_now(void)
> >> +{
> >> + struct system_counterval_t tsc_cycles;
> >> + u64 tsc_ns;
> >> +
> >> + get_tsc_ns(&tsc_cycles, &tsc_ns);
> >> +
> >> + return tsc_ns;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_art_ns_now);
> >
> > While the changes look innocuous I'm missing the big picture why this needs
> > to emulate ART instead of simply using TSC directly.
>
> i don't think we're emulating ART here (other than the name in the
> function). We're just reading TSC and converting to nanoseconds, right?

Well, the function name says clearly: get_art_ns_now(). But you are not
using ART, you use the TSC and derive the ART value from it (incorrectly).

Thanks,

tglx