From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 21:56:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190724045610.GC643@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722182443.216015-4-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Although commit 669de8bda87b ("kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys
> for workqueues") unregisters dynamic lockdep keys when a workqueue is
> destroyed, a side effect of that commit is that all stack traces
> associated with the lockdep key are leaked when a workqueue is destroyed.
> Fix this by storing each unique stack trace once. Other changes in this
> patch are:
> - Use NULL instead of { .nr_entries = 0 } to represent 'no trace'.
> - Store a pointer to a stack trace in struct lock_class and struct
> lock_list instead of storing 'nr_entries' and 'offset'.
>
> This patch avoids that the following program triggers the "BUG:
> MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!" complaint:
Does this also fix any of the other bugs listed at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190710055838.GC2152@sol.localdomain/
?
BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!
BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS too low!
BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low! (2)
BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES too low!
>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> int main()
> {
> for (;;) {
> int fd = open("/dev/infiniband/rdma_cm", O_RDWR);
> close(fd);
> }
> }
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Can you please add:
Reported-by: syzbot+6f39a9deb697359fe520@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Thanks,
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-24 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-22 18:24 [PATCH 0/4] Lockdep: Reduce stack trace memory usage Bart Van Assche
2019-07-22 18:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] locking/lockdep: Make it clear that what lock_class::key points at is not modified Bart Van Assche
2019-07-25 16:08 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-07-22 18:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] stacktrace: Constify 'entries' arguments Bart Van Assche
2019-07-25 16:09 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-07-22 18:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces Bart Van Assche
2019-07-24 4:56 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2019-07-24 15:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-07-25 16:10 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-07-22 18:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] locking/lockdep: Report more stack trace statistics Bart Van Assche
2019-07-25 16:10 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-07-23 9:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] Lockdep: Reduce stack trace memory usage Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190724045610.GC643@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=duyuyang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox