From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hmm: replace hmm_update with mmu_notifier_range
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:05:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190724070553.GA2523@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190723210506.25127-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
One comment on a related cleanup:
> list_for_each_entry(mirror, &hmm->mirrors, list) {
> int rc;
>
> - rc = mirror->ops->sync_cpu_device_pagetables(mirror, &update);
> + rc = mirror->ops->sync_cpu_device_pagetables(mirror, nrange);
> if (rc) {
> - if (WARN_ON(update.blockable || rc != -EAGAIN))
> + if (WARN_ON(mmu_notifier_range_blockable(nrange) ||
> + rc != -EAGAIN))
> continue;
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> break;
This magic handling of error seems odd. I think we should merge rc and
ret into one variable and just break out if any error happens instead
or claiming in the comments -EAGAIN is the only valid error and then
ignoring all others here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-24 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-23 21:05 [PATCH] mm/hmm: replace hmm_update with mmu_notifier_range Ralph Campbell
2019-07-24 7:05 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-07-24 15:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-24 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-24 18:00 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-24 18:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-24 17:58 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-24 18:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-24 18:56 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-24 18:59 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-24 19:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-24 19:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-24 20:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-25 1:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-25 17:53 ` Ralph Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190724070553.GA2523@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox