The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Subject: Re: x86 - clang / objtool status
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 18:52:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190724165248.GD31381@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724023946.yxsz5im22fz4zxrn@treble>

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:43:24PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:40:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x86: redundant UACCESS disable
> 
> Looking at this one, I think I agree with objtool.
> 
> PeterZ, Linus, I know y'all discussed this code a few months ago.
> 
> __copy_from_user() already does a CLAC in its error path.  So isn't the
> user_access_end() redundant for the __copy_from_user() error path?
> 
> Untested fix:

Run this past i915 people, but with the objtool patch I just posted it
reproduces with GCC and this patch makes it go away.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 5fae0e50aad0..41dab9ea33cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -1628,6 +1628,7 @@ static int check_relocations(const struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry)
>  
>  static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  {
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs;
>  	const unsigned int count = eb->buffer_count;
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	int err;
> @@ -1635,7 +1636,6 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>  		const unsigned int nreloc = eb->exec[i].relocation_count;
>  		struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry __user *urelocs;
> -		struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs;
>  		unsigned long size;
>  		unsigned long copied;
>  
> @@ -1663,14 +1663,8 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  
>  			if (__copy_from_user((char *)relocs + copied,
>  					     (char __user *)urelocs + copied,
> -					     len)) {
> -end_user:
> -				user_access_end();
> -end:
> -				kvfree(relocs);
> -				err = -EFAULT;
> -				goto err;
> -			}
> +					     len))
> +				goto end;
>  
>  			copied += len;
>  		} while (copied < size);
> @@ -1699,10 +1693,14 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> +end_user:
> +	user_access_end();
> +end:
> +	kvfree(relocs);
> +	err = -EFAULT;
>  err:
>  	while (i--) {
> -		struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs =
> -			u64_to_ptr(typeof(*relocs), eb->exec[i].relocs_ptr);
> +		relocs = u64_to_ptr(typeof(*relocs), eb->exec[i].relocs_ptr);
>  		if (eb->exec[i].relocation_count)
>  			kvfree(relocs);
>  	}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-24 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-18 20:40 x86 - clang / objtool status Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-18 20:58 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-19  6:39   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-19  7:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-19  7:03     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-24 16:57     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-18 22:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-19  6:44   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-19 11:37 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-19 13:48   ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-22 15:40     ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-25  6:17       ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24  2:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24  7:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 12:37     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 12:55     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 13:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 14:05         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 14:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 16:48           ` [PATCH] objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 16:54             ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-24 16:55             ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-24 18:30             ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24 18:32               ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24 16:52   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-07-24 17:22   ` x86 - clang / objtool status Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190724165248.GD31381@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox