public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, alan.cox@intel.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	pengfei.xu@intel.com,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] swiotlb: Zero out bounce buffer for untrusted device
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:49:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190725114903.GB31065@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190725031717.32317-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

> index 43c88626a1f3..edc84a00b9f9 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>  #include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>  #include <linux/set_memory.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #endif
> @@ -562,6 +563,11 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
>  	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < nslots; i++)
>  		io_tlb_orig_addr[index+i] = orig_addr + (i << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> +
> +	/* Zero out the bounce buffer if the consumer is untrusted. */
> +	if (dev_is_untrusted(hwdev))
> +		memset(phys_to_virt(tlb_addr), 0, alloc_size);

Hmm.  Maybe we need to move the untrusted flag to struct device?
Directly poking into the pci_dev from swiotlb is a bit of a layering
violation.

> +
>  	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
>  	    (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
>  		swiotlb_bounce(orig_addr, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

Also for the case where we bounce here we only need to zero the padding
(if there is any), so I think we could optimize this a bit.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-25 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-25  3:17 [PATCH v5 00/10] iommu: Bounce page for untrusted devices Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] iommu/vt-d: Don't switch off swiotlb if use direct dma Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  5:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Use per-device dma_ops Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  5:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-25  7:18     ` Lu Baolu
2019-07-25 11:43       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-26  1:56         ` Lu Baolu
2019-11-12  7:16           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13  2:50             ` Lu Baolu
2019-11-13  7:03               ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13  9:53                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-14  5:14                   ` Lu Baolu
2019-11-14  8:14                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-15  0:57                       ` Lu Baolu
2019-11-20 10:44                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] iommu/vt-d: Cleanup after use per-device dma ops Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] PCI: Add dev_is_untrusted helper Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  5:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] swiotlb: Split size parameter to map/unmap APIs Lu Baolu
2019-07-25 11:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] swiotlb: Zero out bounce buffer for untrusted device Lu Baolu
2019-07-25 11:49   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-07-26  2:21     ` Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] iommu: Add bounce page APIs Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] iommu/vt-d: Check whether device requires bounce buffer Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] iommu/vt-d: Add trace events for device dma map/unmap Lu Baolu
2019-07-25 12:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-07-26  2:24     ` Lu Baolu
2019-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] iommu/vt-d: Use bounce buffer for untrusted devices Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190725114903.GB31065@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pengfei.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox