From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1F3C41514 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED555229F3 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729950AbfGYNEW (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:04:22 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35198 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727031AbfGYNEU (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:04:20 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 557F068B02; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:04:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:04:16 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Auger Eric Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Robin Murphy , eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call Message-ID: <20190725130416.GA4992@lst.de> References: <20190722145509.1284-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190722145509.1284-3-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190723153851.GE720@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:53:49PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote: > I am confused: if vring_use_dma_api() returns false if the dma_mask is > unset (ie. vring_use_dma_api() returns false), the virtio-blk-pci device > will not be able to get translated addresses and won't work properly. > > The patch above allows the dma api to be used and only influences the > max_segment_size and it works properly. > > So is it normal the dma_mask is unset in my case? Its not normal. I assume you use virtio-nmio? Due to the mess with the dma_mask being a pointer a lot of subsystems forgot to set a dma mask up, and oddly enough seem to mostly get away with it.