Re: [PATCH v6 02/16] chardev: introduce cdev_get_by_path()

Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-25T18:15:07Z

On 2019-07-25 12:08 p.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:53:20AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019-07-25 11:40 a.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:23:21AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> cdev_get_by_path() attempts to retrieve a struct cdev from
>>>> a path name. It is analagous to blkdev_get_by_path().
>>>>
>>>> This will be necessary to create a nvme_ctrl_get_by_path()to
>>>> support NVMe-OF passthru.
>>>
>>> Ick, why? Why would a cdev have a "pathname"?
>>
>> So we can go from "/dev/nvme0" (which points to a char device) to its
>> struct cdev and eventually it's struct nvme_ctrl. Doing it this way also
>> allows supporting symlinks that might be created by udev rules.
>
> Why do you have a "string" within the kernel and are not using the
> normal open() call from userspace on the character device node on the
> filesystem in your namespace/mount/whatever?

NVMe-OF is configured using configfs. The target is specified by the
user writing a path to a configfs attribute. This is the way it works
today but with blkdev_get_by_path()[1]. For the passthru code, we need
to get a nvme_ctrl instead of a block_device, but the principal is the same.

> Where is this random string coming from?

configfs

> Why is this so special that no
> one else has ever needed it?

People have needed the same functionality for block devices and
blkdev_get_by_path() has multiple users (iscsi, drbd, nvme-of, etc)
which are doing similar things. Nobody has needed to do the same with a
chardev until we wanted the NVMe-of to support targeting an NVMe
controller which is represented in userspace by a char device.

Logan

[1]