From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EF1C7618B for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B29206BA for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="bVGeuI7+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388190AbfG2Sn0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:43:26 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:44855 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387397AbfG2Sn0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:43:26 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s7so122163420iob.11; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:43:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=geRb+xmd/f1jkfORhsVtE+k/0a+B//EFaGFVIsLhObc=; b=bVGeuI7+q/E6mMswliDCz5OpxuOF2eZwPcikFI3x4GEAaaAXOXFZ+8Htj8ll/l9F2t /Q/VMn6gBqwyipbpE8ng2QfLvCZpmE6bdnvk7aOgwIY2JaHwhTF0UgMlMLiSpvImPTKR HigBQNrJF8VslcQO9/DI1GUodVbgwlm17LlysCTTUShA8QNosP1S/Nf2w+8tZebujVZp Bf0oEFRr9pNxj1oJHJWuaxcisdKodimMFYVrKHpC/VTEBiXwrm9119y6yOI88ozlWomw HKOrJsEoLIHCvmw1cyr5vrfVo0KK7UEIiRpg2fLiysi5SgYWm8qeOj87mMO/LVnoDGrH JOEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=geRb+xmd/f1jkfORhsVtE+k/0a+B//EFaGFVIsLhObc=; b=MM4oxbzb1dx8EYMbx/vT94u9M3eDoJbsr+RSganQsdewoopXCLnrP3Kgxzrs3LKvWm tsSqpgeNLRPfFdy9cJtNEDA+2Mgf2729UHj/cHdQGkbovw7MfbTNjE1sEnHWl4jqqgE4 qd9+LamDN2bhJXc9nBAjSjhXOgcm0XPsFOfG6ei/HIYSlIlIgihmFyCM27Fif7/b150P M88zBs1u90X+Zhxq4ZY+1QcLBWkm0PyBkGiPRzOtBVA7XcPEYWxB3UsTu22LOiy4OnVA 3HCWcIRQeA3RcVD1P/fRHRyKs9W5uSJ30u8IiGTuHe2AqOfagdXo9NNohHxk6WobVaKF vLzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUfr9FXRqLvf4kdSVW1cdnStcdsRunDjcwRHrJx8FLfUH5UJGd4 hVqhTNUCl+tbSbLP52V2tcc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzChUsC55AGMMrdotkBYf7SylCuLSJNaWeI3qCUXDnZzs22DtP+LVRSR2fdOOx7zcHNUg6HRA== X-Received: by 2002:a02:710f:: with SMTP id n15mr75388873jac.119.1564425805584; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([8.46.76.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm60634224iol.59.2019.07.29.11.43.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:43:06 +0200 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" Cc: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: keyboard: gpio_keys_polled: use gpio lookup table Message-ID: <20190729184306.GA767@penguin> References: <1564415994-22871-1-git-send-email-info@metux.net> <20190729172607.GB755@penguin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 08:14:52PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 29.07.19 19:26, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi, > > > As I think I mentioned a while back I would prefer to get gpiolob > > > support swnode-backed properties so that the driver would not need > to> know about differences between ACPI, DT and static board files. > Indeed would be nice. But I think we should get rid of raw gpio IDs in > favour of gpiod lookup tables first. > > > I just recently re-posted patches for this, let's see if we can get them > landed in the kernel. > Can you give me a pointer ? https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11042915/ I tried putting you on CC list there, did you not get them? Thanks. -- Dmitry