From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
songliubraving@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, tz.stoyanov@gmail.com,
alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: Support aarch64 random socket_id assignment
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:09:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190802130926.GB27223@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564717737-21602-1-git-send-email-tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 11:48:57AM +0800, Tan Xiaojun wrote:
> Same as the commit 01766229533f ("perf record: Support s390 random
> socket_id assignment"), aarch64 also have this problem.
>
> Without this fix:
> [root@localhost perf]# ./perf report --header -I -v
> ...
> socket_id number is too big.You may need to upgrade the perf tool.
>
> # ========
> # captured on : Thu Aug 1 22:58:38 2019
> # header version : 1
> ...
> # Core ID and Socket ID information is not available
> ...
>
> With this fix:
> [root@localhost perf]# ./perf report --header -I -v
> ...
> cpumask list: 0-31
> cpumask list: 32-63
> cpumask list: 64-95
> cpumask list: 96-127
>
> # ========
> # captured on : Thu Aug 1 22:58:38 2019
> # header version : 1
> ...
> # CPU 0: Core ID 0, Socket ID 36
> # CPU 1: Core ID 1, Socket ID 36
> ...
> # CPU 126: Core ID 126, Socket ID 8442
> # CPU 127: Core ID 127, Socket ID 8442
> ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
thanks,
jirka
> ---
> tools/perf/util/header.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index 20111f8..d57fb74 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -2251,8 +2251,10 @@ static int process_cpu_topology(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
> /* On s390 the socket_id number is not related to the numbers of cpus.
> * The socket_id number might be higher than the numbers of cpus.
> * This depends on the configuration.
> + * AArch64 is the same.
> */
> - if (ph->env.arch && !strncmp(ph->env.arch, "s390", 4))
> + if (ph->env.arch && (!strncmp(ph->env.arch, "s390", 4)
> + || !strncmp(ph->env.arch, "aarch64", 7)))
> do_core_id_test = false;
>
> for (i = 0; i < (u32)cpu_nr; i++) {
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 3:48 [PATCH] perf record: Support aarch64 random socket_id assignment Tan Xiaojun
2019-08-02 13:09 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-08-13 14:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-08-15 9:35 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Tan Xiaojun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190802130926.GB27223@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tanxiaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=tz.stoyanov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox