Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fork: extend clone3() to support CLONE_SET_TID

Christian Brauner
2019-08-02T13:52:54Z

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > So Adrian, sorry for confusion, I think your patch is fine.
>
> Yes... but do we really need the new CLONE_SET_TID ?
>
> set_tid == 0 has no effect, can't we simply check kargs->set_tid != 0
> before ns_capable() ?

Yeah, I agree that sounds much better and aligns with exit_signal.

Christian