From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A46C433FF for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 07:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852C3218B8 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 07:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731778AbfHHH7v (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 03:59:51 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44280 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731548AbfHHH7v (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 03:59:51 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id DE88068B02; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:59:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:59:47 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Rob Clark Cc: Mark Rutland , Christoph Hellwig , Rob Clark , dri-devel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Sean Paul , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Allison Randal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: add cache support for arm64 Message-ID: <20190808075947.GE30308@lst.de> References: <20190805211451.20176-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <20190806084821.GA17129@lst.de> <20190806143457.GF475@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20190807123807.GD54191@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20190807164958.GA44765@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:30:04AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > So, we do end up using GFP_HIGHUSER, which appears to get passed thru > when shmem gets to the point of actually allocating pages.. not sure > if that just ends up being a hint, or if it guarantees that we don't > get something in the linear map. > > (Bear with me while I "page" this all back in.. last time I dug thru > the shmem code was probably pre-armv8, or at least before I had any > armv8 hw) GFP_HIGHUSER basically just means that this is an allocation that could dip into highmem, in which case it would not have a kernel mapping. This can happen on arm + LPAE, but not on arm64.