From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67E6C433FF for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 21:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37BF2089E for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 21:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404301AbfHHV4g (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 17:56:36 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:49942 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725785AbfHHV4g (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 17:56:36 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 7D1DE68B02; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 23:56:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 23:56:32 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , Jerome Glisse , Jason Gunthorpe , Steven Price , Linux-MM , Linux List Kernel Mailing Subject: Re: cleanup the walk_page_range interface Message-ID: <20190808215632.GA12773@lst.de> References: <20190808154240.9384-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Note that both Thomas and Steven have series touching this area pending, > > and there are a couple consumer in flux too - the hmm tree already > > conflicts with this series, and I have potential dma changes on top of > > the consumers in Thomas and Steven's series, so we'll probably need a > > git tree similar to the hmm one to synchronize these updates. > > I'd be willing to just merge this now, if that helps. The conversion > is mechanical, and my only slight worry would be that at least for my > original patch I didn't build-test the (few) non-x86 > architecture-specific cases. But I did end up looking at them fairly > closely (basically using some grep/sed scripts to see that the > conversions I did matched the same patterns). And your changes look > like obvious improvements too where any mistake would have been caught > by the compiler. I did cross compile the s390 and powerpc bits, but I do not have an openrisc compiler. > So I'm not all that worried from a functionality standpoint, and if > this will help the next merge window, I'll happily pull now. That would help with this series vs the others, but not with the other series vs each other.