From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA73DC31E40 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD72214C6 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ds2Z5YV6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436639AbfHIQwK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 12:52:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com ([209.85.214.193]:34742 "EHLO mail-pl1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726157AbfHIQwJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 12:52:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id i2so45219863plt.1; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:52:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O+nfQfUaMACIDpLI1zl3ljQDTfG64Jwg7wf2QochBqo=; b=ds2Z5YV6ZgUP1nBp2sWI/rTb2MHebksvTqZdBmwQNRh+UouUyEwGBnTCqU6OFzAA1u gHQo3Rd7jRise9U+4/09kUKvt0R6HAnYA7u7YzFoiPdV4x97gnNO4vLvksy101chmToa SoghHE5CNzouHT4Clxf6c8B789Jr4I1eWlYUQ5DhQdd2Lds7hXJIk/qQp6b2bXkEoH2W K4D5ZYGS3PD2sJgXIPWcHoRDDOvyItM4Eu/3ZOmTxUaaT25Jg+hk/+p4zRAlMa6B6urv Ua9intHjnYWDOLPomM/V3XtmyHLtDiWxqV1zJ92OL4t6Ja+oZW9gL22SqjkxqGOFvj1Q 8XJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O+nfQfUaMACIDpLI1zl3ljQDTfG64Jwg7wf2QochBqo=; b=uhaU/GVoD0PnOzYB+Fr1qYbhgH8m+b77AuQrnFMcSLz5744IdvSYMRXNQlO0yvYkDr Qo/M1TyyP6YzKJ6rz1dNWwM8ot0g9F94jCowChZyjZFbkYeG6Z1Iw2WmUzo/GUOpecHb PRU4jk2JRWpK4ammljEqluJFHq4nfrhF+Yo8PB3/kXZKLcHEV8hCRwPJK0jrw5OhZkiF /io9WdFDztFKHWjUQZ7tvAeMrSwfX2zMSaHDvmUIy/i3/AZa7u6ql1r8DiTjV422odfv NwHRd/Dayj93hXkKnIte/9rf5hlS7cwbGG95X/E43IEsoftPtRTXDpd1E8foLhikY3UW 1Egw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV+MM/HADFMY2/9nsWytVh5uDtAr+F5LS4r2zzkgcxNxrhzssq1 kmWklZLcg+KdTeiUCu4rFBGA70KS X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyv2+a4p5Rp/Fe3d38AYt9VwBO4k+zOsd340q2xHe+qzfwAKrunFbgiQmovTYCeKXbKj1qnsg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b713:: with SMTP id d19mr20211023pls.267.1565369529204; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i14sm3801432pfq.77.2019.08.09.09.52.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:52:07 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Paul Cercueil Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , od@zcrc.me, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] watchdog: jz4740: Driver update Message-ID: <20190809165207.GA18104@roeck-us.net> References: <20190809115930.6050-1-paul@crapouillou.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190809115930.6050-1-paul@crapouillou.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Hi, > > This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in smaller > pieces for easier integration to mainline. > (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837) > > The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The exception > is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This function was > added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree. > > For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4 branch of > the MIPS tree > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git). > What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ? Thanks, Guenter