From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security tree
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:34:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201908121033.BFBE9516AC@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190812145823.63d77573@canb.auug.org.au>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 02:58:23PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the security tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like below.
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 45d29f9e9b8b ("security: Support early LSMs")
>
> I have added the following fix for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:54:20 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] early_security_init() needs a stub got !CONFIG_SECURITY
>
> An arm multi_v7_defconfig fails like this:
>
> init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel':
> init/main.c:596:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'early_security_init'; did you mean 'security_init'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> early_security_init();
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> security_init
>
> Fixes: 45d29f9e9b8b ("security: Support early LSMs")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-Kees
> ---
> include/linux/security.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 807dc0d24982..23e1c3f17d48 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -473,6 +473,11 @@ static inline int security_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int early_security_init(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline int security_binder_set_context_mgr(struct task_struct *mgr)
> {
> return 0;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-12 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-12 4:58 linux-next: build failure after merge of the security tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-12 17:34 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-08-19 3:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-19 3:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-21 16:39 ` James Morris
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-24 4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-10 1:18 Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-10 3:44 ` Paul Moore
2025-02-10 3:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-10 14:51 ` Paul Moore
2020-07-08 4:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-13 2:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-13 2:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-29 23:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-30 2:35 ` James Morris
2020-07-30 2:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-30 5:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-04 3:36 ` James Morris
2017-08-23 11:12 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-17 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-17 3:24 ` Kees Cook
2016-05-19 4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-19 10:11 ` David Howells
2016-05-19 23:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-20 3:07 ` Steve French
2015-08-17 5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-17 6:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-26 14:45 ` David Howells
2014-07-25 9:21 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201908121033.BFBE9516AC@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox