Re: [PATCH 02/15] riscv: use CSR_SATP instead of the legacy sptbr name in switch_mm

Paul Walmsley
2019-08-13T16:52:01Z

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 09:36:23AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > > Switch to our own constant for the satp register instead of using
> > > the old name from a legacy version of the privileged spec.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> >
> > Didn't you want us to replace this with Bin Meng's patch?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20190807151316.GB16432@infradead.org/
> >
> > If so, probably best just to drop this one and state a dependency.
>
> Either way is fine with me. But until you have a branch with
> either one applied I'm going to keep resending my patch, as random
> dependencies on uncommitted patches don't work.

If you're going to resend a patch, it's better to resend the other one
that you've explicitly endorsed in favor of your own.

- Paul