From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=31nU=WT=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE159C3A5A2
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 22:08:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8106E2166E
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 22:08:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=default; t=1566598115;
	bh=G0dH8kOQk5jbwTacpJ4dBkjxVRoiZa/oibpE8Yd5mBI=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From;
	b=KvOKeYg4jnu0GB3Eq31s1XKT9ykYha7xqp215za3k6QzluLD/jcdQfpzvFfx0KNJX
	 S1OUfjuC9nsYmEtgnJ5BUM4z2d/WAcWSFgogdogPlO8eTGZnvCKn5Ie3DKlBmf3O4P
	 4j/ji66GeVkJDihf/anN3Eh6u2r1o9xLNv3RAOLk=
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2393566AbfHWWIe (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:08:34 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49700 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S2390696AbfHWWIe (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:08:34 -0400
Received: from localhost (lfbn-ncy-1-174-150.w83-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.194.254.150])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D7632133F;
        Fri, 23 Aug 2019 22:08:32 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=default; t=1566598113;
        bh=G0dH8kOQk5jbwTacpJ4dBkjxVRoiZa/oibpE8Yd5mBI=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
        b=OX5QxC6ns/DPJeqbU8tZXjkiINGgbP0inlm0wpFYHsB0Z6xF+5+HSJwJ8VYMV4NFi
         NTA79TSYGyuOh/EaQXM/6rwQ28q12xSmtxwfSmep8H8qQ62ZvW8YTezzIWVMWAUco5
         j+ALBOepABXsEFPS2iGEkh85mv9T6m6pd3V3LqSs=
Date:   Sat, 24 Aug 2019 00:08:30 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 25/38] posix-cpu-timers: Provide array based sample
 functions
Message-ID: <20190823220829.GF18880@lenoir>
References: <20190821190847.665673890@linutronix.de>
 <20190821192921.590362974@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190821192921.590362974@linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 09:09:12PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Instead of using task_cputime and doing the addition of utime and stime at
> all call sites, it's way simpler to have a sample array which allows
> indexed based checks against the expiry cache array.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>