From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, jstancek@redhat.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5.2 2/2] lcoking/rwsem: Add missing ACQUIRE to read_slowpath sleep loop
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:31:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190826143114.23471-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190826143114.23471-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
[ Upstream commit 99143f82a255e7f054bead8443462fae76dd829e ]
While reviewing another read_slowpath patch, both Will and I noticed
another missing ACQUIRE, namely:
X = 0;
CPU0 CPU1
rwsem_down_read()
for (;;) {
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
X = 1;
rwsem_up_write();
rwsem_mark_wake()
atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count);
smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL);
if (!waiter.task)
break;
...
}
r = X;
Allows 'r == 0'.
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
This is a backport for the v5.2 stable tree. There were multiple reports
of this issue being hit.
Given that there were a few changes to the code around this, I'd
appreciate an ack before pulling it in.
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 397dedc58432d..385ebcfc31a6d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -485,8 +485,10 @@ __rwsem_down_read_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
/* wait to be given the lock */
while (true) {
set_current_state(state);
- if (!waiter.task)
+ if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter.task)) {
+ /* Orders against rwsem_mark_wake()'s smp_store_release() */
break;
+ }
if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
if (waiter.task)
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-26 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-26 14:31 [PATCH v5.2 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add missing ACQUIRE to read_slowpath exit when queue is empty Sasha Levin
2019-08-26 14:31 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-08-27 14:11 ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-29 18:38 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190826143114.23471-2-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox