From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH V3 6/8] perf/x86/intel: Disable sampling read slots and topdown
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:47:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190826144740.10163-7-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190826144740.10163-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The slots event supports sampling. Users may sampling read slots and
metrics events, e.g perf record -e '{slots, topdown-retiring}:S'.
But the metrics event will reset the fixed counter 3 which will impact
the sampling of the slots event.
Add specific validate_group() support to reject the case and error out
for Icelake.
An alternative fix may unconditionally disable SLOTS sampling. But it's
not a decent fix. Because users may want to only sampling slot events
without topdown metrics event.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 4 ++++
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 77573fa379dc..7fb98890d885 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2057,7 +2057,11 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
fake_cpuc->n_events = 0;
ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(fake_cpuc, n, NULL);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+ if (x86_pmu.validate_group)
+ ret = x86_pmu.validate_group(fake_cpuc, n);
out:
free_fake_cpuc(fake_cpuc);
return ret;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 7925cf8830eb..4e0d60fcd1eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4489,6 +4489,25 @@ static __init void intel_ht_bug(void)
x86_pmu.stop_scheduling = intel_stop_scheduling;
}
+static int icl_validate_group(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n)
+{
+ bool has_sampling_slots = false, has_metrics = false;
+ struct perf_event *e;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ e = cpuc->event_list[i];
+ if (is_slots_event(e) && is_sampling_event(e))
+ has_sampling_slots = true;
+
+ if (is_metric_event(e))
+ has_metrics = true;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(has_sampling_slots && has_metrics))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
+}
+
EVENT_ATTR_STR(mem-loads, mem_ld_hsw, "event=0xcd,umask=0x1,ldlat=3");
EVENT_ATTR_STR(mem-stores, mem_st_hsw, "event=0xd0,umask=0x82")
@@ -5334,6 +5353,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_skl(pmem);
x86_pmu.update_topdown_event = icl_update_topdown_event;
x86_pmu.set_topdown_event_period = icl_set_topdown_event_period;
+ x86_pmu.validate_group = icl_validate_group;
pr_cont("Icelake events, ");
name = "icelake";
break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 7c59f08fadc0..34c6ab5cafe8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -629,6 +629,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
int perfctr_second_write;
u64 (*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, u64 l);
+ int (*validate_group)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n);
+
/* PMI handler bits */
unsigned int late_ack :1,
counter_freezing :1;
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-26 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-26 14:47 [RESEND PATCH V3 0/8] TopDown metrics support for Icelake kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 1/8] perf/x86/intel: Set correct mask for TOPDOWN.SLOTS kan.liang
2019-08-28 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 2/8] perf/x86/intel: Basic support for metrics counters kan.liang
2019-08-28 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 13:59 ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-28 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 13:51 ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-28 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 3/8] perf/x86/intel: Support hardware TopDown metrics kan.liang
2019-08-28 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 19:04 ` Andi Kleen
2019-08-31 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-09 13:40 ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-28 19:35 ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-28 15:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 16:11 ` [PATCH] x86/math64: Provide a sane mul_u64_u32_div() implementation for x86_64 Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 16:17 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 3/8] perf/x86/intel: Support hardware TopDown metrics Andi Kleen
2019-08-28 16:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29 3:11 ` Andi Kleen
2019-08-29 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29 13:31 ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-29 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29 16:56 ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-31 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-30 23:18 ` Stephane Eranian
2019-08-31 0:31 ` Andi Kleen
2019-08-31 9:13 ` Stephane Eranian
2019-08-31 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 17:53 ` Andi Kleen
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Support per thread RDPMC " kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 5/8] perf/x86/intel: Export TopDown events for Icelake kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` kan.liang [this message]
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 7/8] perf, tools, stat: Support new per thread TopDown metrics kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 8/8] perf, tools: Add documentation for topdown metrics kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190826144740.10163-7-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox