From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Mark existing SBI as legacy SBI.
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:37:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190827083700.GF682@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhSdy0zOtHftesYW9uuM0gjsOcvyhfuBETbtKaR2Kc1-_sCAQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 01:58:03PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:21 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:32:55PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > As per the new SBI specification, current SBI implementation is
> > > defined as legacy and will be removed/replaced in future.
> > >
> > > Rename existing implementation to reflect that. This patch is just
> > > a preparatory patch for SBI v0.2 and doesn't introduce any functional
> > > changes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 61 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > > index 21134b3ef404..7f5ecaaaa0d7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > > @@ -8,17 +8,18 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > >
> > > -#define SBI_SET_TIMER 0
> > > -#define SBI_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 1
> > > -#define SBI_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 2
> > > -#define SBI_CLEAR_IPI 3
> > > -#define SBI_SEND_IPI 4
> > > -#define SBI_REMOTE_FENCE_I 5
> > > -#define SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA 6
> > > -#define SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID 7
> > > -#define SBI_SHUTDOWN 8
> > > -
> > > -#define SBI_CALL(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) ({ \
> > > +
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SET_TIMER 0x0
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 0x1
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 0x2
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CLEAR_IPI 0x3
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SEND_IPI 0x4
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_FENCE_I 0x5
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA 0x6
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID 0x7
> > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SHUTDOWN 0x8
> >
> > I can't say I'm closely following RISC-V development, but what will happen
> > when SBI v0.3 will come out and will render v0.2 legacy?
> > Won't we need another similar renaming then?
>
> Going forward with SBI v0.3 and higher, we won't see any calling
> convention changes.
>
> The SBI spec will be maintained and improved by RISC-V UNIX
> platform spec working group.
>
> My best guess is that, all future SBI releases (v0.3 or higher) will
> include more optional SBI extensions (hart hotplug, power management, etc).
Thanks for the clarification!
> Regards,
> Anup
>
> >
> > > +#define SBI_CALL_LEGACY(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) ({ \
> > > register uintptr_t a0 asm ("a0") = (uintptr_t)(arg0); \
> > > register uintptr_t a1 asm ("a1") = (uintptr_t)(arg1); \
> > > register uintptr_t a2 asm ("a2") = (uintptr_t)(arg2); \
> > > @@ -32,58 +33,61 @@
> > > })
> > >
> > > /* Lazy implementations until SBI is finalized */
> > > -#define SBI_CALL_0(which) SBI_CALL(which, 0, 0, 0, 0)
> > > -#define SBI_CALL_1(which, arg0) SBI_CALL(which, arg0, 0, 0, 0)
> > > -#define SBI_CALL_2(which, arg0, arg1) SBI_CALL(which, arg0, arg1, 0, 0)
> > > -#define SBI_CALL_3(which, arg0, arg1, arg2) \
> > > - SBI_CALL(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, 0)
> > > -#define SBI_CALL_4(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) \
> > > - SBI_CALL(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3)
> > > +#define SBI_CALL_LEGACY_0(which) SBI_CALL_LEGACY(which, 0, 0, 0, 0)
> > > +#define SBI_CALL_LEGACY_1(which, arg0) SBI_CALL_LEGACY(which, arg0, 0, 0, 0)
> > > +#define SBI_CALL_LEGACY_2(which, arg0, arg1) \
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY(which, arg0, arg1, 0, 0)
> > > +#define SBI_CALL_LEGACY_3(which, arg0, arg1, arg2) \
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, 0)
> > > +#define SBI_CALL_LEGACY_4(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) \
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3)
> > >
> > > static inline void sbi_console_putchar(int ch)
> > > {
> > > - SBI_CALL_1(SBI_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR, ch);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_1(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR, ch);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline int sbi_console_getchar(void)
> > > {
> > > - return SBI_CALL_0(SBI_CONSOLE_GETCHAR);
> > > + return SBI_CALL_LEGACY_0(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_GETCHAR);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void sbi_set_timer(uint64_t stime_value)
> > > {
> > > #if __riscv_xlen == 32
> > > - SBI_CALL_2(SBI_SET_TIMER, stime_value, stime_value >> 32);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_2(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SET_TIMER, stime_value,
> > > + stime_value >> 32);
> > > #else
> > > - SBI_CALL_1(SBI_SET_TIMER, stime_value);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_1(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SET_TIMER, stime_value);
> > > #endif
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void sbi_shutdown(void)
> > > {
> > > - SBI_CALL_0(SBI_SHUTDOWN);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_0(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SHUTDOWN);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void sbi_clear_ipi(void)
> > > {
> > > - SBI_CALL_0(SBI_CLEAR_IPI);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_0(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CLEAR_IPI);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void sbi_send_ipi(const unsigned long *hart_mask)
> > > {
> > > - SBI_CALL_1(SBI_SEND_IPI, hart_mask);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_1(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SEND_IPI, hart_mask);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void sbi_remote_fence_i(const unsigned long *hart_mask)
> > > {
> > > - SBI_CALL_1(SBI_REMOTE_FENCE_I, hart_mask);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_1(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_FENCE_I, hart_mask);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
> > > unsigned long start,
> > > unsigned long size)
> > > {
> > > - SBI_CALL_3(SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA, hart_mask, start, size);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_3(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA, hart_mask,
> > > + start, size);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
> > > @@ -91,7 +95,8 @@ static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
> > > unsigned long size,
> > > unsigned long asid)
> > > {
> > > - SBI_CALL_4(SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID, hart_mask, start, size, asid);
> > > + SBI_CALL_LEGACY_4(SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID, hart_mask,
> > > + start, size, asid);
> > > }
> > >
> > > #endif
> > > --
> > > 2.21.0
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours,
> > Mike.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-27 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-26 23:32 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add support for SBI version to 0.2 Atish Patra
2019-08-26 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Mark existing SBI as legacy SBI Atish Patra
2019-08-27 7:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-08-27 8:28 ` Anup Patel
2019-08-27 8:37 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2019-08-28 21:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-08-27 20:34 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-27 14:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-27 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-27 20:37 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-29 10:56 ` hch
2019-08-26 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: Add basic support for SBI v0.2 Atish Patra
2019-08-27 7:58 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-08-27 8:23 ` Anup Patel
2019-08-27 8:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-08-27 9:28 ` Anup Patel
2019-08-27 20:30 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-27 9:36 ` Anup Patel
2019-08-27 20:43 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-27 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-27 14:46 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add support for SBI version to 0.2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-27 22:19 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-29 10:59 ` hch
2019-08-30 23:13 ` Atish Patra
2019-09-03 7:38 ` hch
[not found] ` <CANs6eMmcbtJ5KTU00LpfTtXszsdi1Jem_5j6GWO+8Yo3JnvTqg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-09-16 6:54 ` hch
2019-09-16 16:12 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190827083700.GF682@rapoport-lnx \
--to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alankao@andestech.com \
--cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox