From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB38C3A5A3 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 05:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48976208CB for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 05:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727023AbfH3FzS (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:55:18 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:52523 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725902AbfH3FzR (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:55:17 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4D70C68B20; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:55:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:55:14 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch , James Smart , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] nvme: fire discovery log page change events to userspace Message-ID: <20190830055514.GC8492@lst.de> References: <20190712180211.26333-1-sagi@grimberg.me> <20190712180211.26333-4-sagi@grimberg.me> <20190822002328.GP9511@lst.de> <205d06ab-fedc-739d-323f-b358aff2cbfe@grimberg.me> <20190826065639.GA11036@lst.de> <20190826075916.GA30396@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:21:02AM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >> Yes we do, userspace should use it to order events. Does udev not >> handle that properly today? > > The problem is not ordering of events, its really about the fact that > the chardev can be removed and reallocated for a different controller > (could be a completely different discovery controller) by the time > that userspace handles the event. The same is generally true for lot of kernel devices. We could reduce the chance by using the idr cyclic allocator.