public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:28:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903072848.GA22170@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b88719c-782a-4a63-db9f-bf62734a7874@linaro.org>

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 08:40:35AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/09/2019 08:31, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 07:59:39AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ming Lei,
> >>
> >> On 03/09/2019 05:30, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>
> >> [ ... ]
> >>
> >>
> >>>>> 2) irq/timing doesn't cover softirq
> >>>>
> >>>> That's solvable, right?
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, we can extend irq/timing, but ugly for irq/timing, since irq/timing
> >>> focuses on hardirq predication, and softirq isn't involved in that
> >>> purpose.
> >>>
> >>>>  
> >>>>> Daniel, could you take a look and see if irq flood detection can be
> >>>>> implemented easily by irq/timing.c?
> >>>>
> >>>> I assume you can take a look as well, right?
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, I have looked at the code for a while, but I think that irq/timing
> >>> could become complicated unnecessarily for covering irq flood detection,
> >>> meantime it is much less efficient for detecting IRQ flood.
> >>
> >> In the series, there is nothing describing rigorously the problem (I can
> >> only guess) and why the proposed solution solves it.
> >>
> >> What is your definition of an 'irq flood'? A high irq load? An irq
> >> arriving while we are processing the previous one in the bottom halves?
> > 
> > So far, it means that handling interrupt & softirq takes all utilization
> > of one CPU, then processes can't be run on this CPU basically, usually
> > sort of CPU lockup warning will be triggered.
> 
> It is a scheduler problem then ?

Scheduler can do nothing if the CPU is taken completely by handling
interrupt & softirq, so seems not a scheduler problem, IMO.


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-03  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-27  8:53 [PATCH 0/4] genirq/nvme: add IRQF_RESCUE_THREAD for avoiding IRQ flood Ming Lei
2019-08-27  8:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism Ming Lei
2019-08-27 14:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-27 16:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-27 23:04       ` Ming Lei
2019-08-27 23:12         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-27 22:58     ` Ming Lei
2019-08-27 23:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 11:06         ` Ming Lei
2019-08-28 11:23           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 13:50             ` Ming Lei
2019-08-28 14:07               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-03  3:30                 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-03  5:59                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-03  6:31                     ` Ming Lei
2019-09-03  6:40                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-03  7:28                         ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-09-03  7:50                           ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-03  9:30                             ` Ming Lei
2019-09-04 17:07                             ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-04 17:31                               ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-04 17:38                                 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-04 18:02                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 19:47                                     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-05  9:11                                       ` Ming Lei
2019-09-05  9:06                                 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-05 10:37                                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-06  1:22                                     ` Long Li
2019-09-06  4:36                                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-06  4:44                                         ` Long Li
2019-09-06  1:48                                     ` Ming Lei
2019-09-06  5:14                                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-06 18:30                                         ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-06 18:52                                           ` Keith Busch
2019-09-07  0:01                                           ` Ming Lei
2019-09-10  3:10                                             ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-18  0:00                                               ` Long Li
2019-09-20 17:14                                                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-20 19:12                                                   ` Long Li
2019-09-20 20:45                                                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-24  0:57                                                       ` Long Li
2019-09-18 14:37                                               ` Ming Lei
2019-09-20 17:09                                                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-06 14:18                                       ` Keith Busch
2019-09-06 17:50                                         ` Long Li
2019-09-06 22:19                                           ` Ming Lei
2019-09-06 22:25                                             ` Keith Busch
2019-09-06 23:13                                               ` Ming Lei
2019-09-10  0:24                                             ` Ming Lei
2019-09-03  8:09                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-03  9:24                             ` Ming Lei
2019-08-29  6:15   ` Long Li
2019-08-30  0:55     ` Ming Lei
2019-08-27  8:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] genirq: add IRQF_RESCUE_THREAD Ming Lei
2019-08-27  8:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvme: pci: pass IRQF_RESCURE_THREAD to request_threaded_irq Ming Lei
2019-08-27  9:06   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-08-27  9:09     ` Ming Lei
2019-08-27  9:12       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-08-27 14:34       ` Keith Busch
2019-08-27 14:44         ` Keith Busch
2019-08-27 15:10   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-08-28  1:45     ` Ming Lei
2019-08-27  8:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] genirq: use irq's affinity for threaded irq with IRQF_RESCUE_THREAD Ming Lei
2019-08-27 14:35   ` Keith Busch
2019-09-06  8:50   ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190903072848.GA22170@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox