From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E788BC3A5AA for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DA820820 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:06:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567613192; bh=9msoC85KjAkTZ+3NyTfzwtqHQ+ihqnOm2jDZUcXZ8B4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=Ou1oucP5/+A1DLipetEbsBOrvQ3GMr5KoEZdM4f+t/P8dvhVpK+wrCNf0+oZrXpSE t4GR5sFUk9XnOHB7xMsoDixNyqHqYYiZLlN9JUPI+BwiGAEXXUc9YE5Ork7M4vS5/q q6sYVLsbHt7UrsSt3CLuFm+zWt5L9nS2FBDSGC0U= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733285AbfIDQC1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:02:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38404 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733265AbfIDQCZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:02:25 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67B8822DBF; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:02:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567612945; bh=9msoC85KjAkTZ+3NyTfzwtqHQ+ihqnOm2jDZUcXZ8B4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=X3kziu+5lOf1/qd66LKDBRZhkn9XiN7tHSIObOtaW7LJC2HF1ch7JdKdUWEmZzGMr iqVkAwOKMBb80LP+OCOixEfUXdLVIBRQQrh7Ick3tmrRk0p+o6kHcoQ+8wvFbz7XVn MQvG7uQ4s30lWSVrPRoqsjbKkR7bY/IVbMdGjeyY= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tony Lindgren , Sasha Levin , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 03/27] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix omap4 errata warning on other SoCs Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:01:56 -0400 Message-Id: <20190904160220.4545-3-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190904160220.4545-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190904160220.4545-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Tony Lindgren [ Upstream commit 45da5e09dd32fa98c32eaafe2513db6bd75e2f4f ] We have errata i688 workaround produce warnings on SoCs other than omap4 and omap5: omap4_sram_init:Unable to allocate sram needed to handle errata I688 omap4_sram_init:Unable to get sram pool needed to handle errata I688 This is happening because there is no ti,omap4-mpu node, or no SRAM to configure for the other SoCs, so let's remove the warning based on the SoC revision checks. As nobody has complained it seems that the other SoC variants do not need this workaround. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c index cf65ab8bb0046..e5dcbda20129d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ static int __init omap4_sram_init(void) struct device_node *np; struct gen_pool *sram_pool; + if (!soc_is_omap44xx() && !soc_is_omap54xx()) + return 0; + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,omap4-mpu"); if (!np) pr_warn("%s:Unable to allocate sram needed to handle errata I688\n", -- 2.20.1