public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Boris Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@oracle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jon Grimm <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>,
	kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	patrick.colp@oracle.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Add an option to reload microcode even if revision is unchanged
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:21:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190905002132.GA26568@otc-nc-03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D8A3D2BD-1FD4-4183-8663-3EF02A6099F3@alien8.de>

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 12:12:29AM +0200, Boris Petkov wrote:
> On September 5, 2019 12:06:54 AM GMT+02:00, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
> >Why do we need to taint kernel here? We are not making any changes.
> 
> Because this is not a normal operation we want users to do. This is only for testing microcode quicker.
> 
> >This won't allow people to load from new microcode blob which I thought
> >was one of the objectives behind this new feature.
> 
> You load a new blob the usual way: echo 1 > ...
> 
> This is the "unusual" way where you reload an already loaded revision only.

But echo 2 > reload would allow reading a microcode file from 
/lib/firmware/intel-ucode/ even if the revision hasn't changed right?

#echo 1 > reload wouldn't load if the revision on disk is same as what's loaded,
and we want to permit that with the echo 2 option.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-05  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29  5:33 [PATCH] x86/microcode: Add an option to reload microcode even if revision is unchanged Ashok Raj
2019-08-29  5:38 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-08-29  6:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-29 13:02   ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-03 16:46     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-04 22:06       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-04 22:12         ` Boris Petkov
2019-09-05  0:21           ` Raj, Ashok [this message]
2019-09-05  7:20             ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-05 10:51               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 19:40               ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-05 19:49                 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-05 20:20                   ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-05 21:22                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 22:27                   ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-06  7:46                     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 12:51                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-06 14:40                       ` Johannes Erdfelt
2019-09-06 15:16                         ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 15:46                           ` Johannes Erdfelt
2019-09-06 16:17                             ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 16:43                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-09-06 17:10                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 16:52                               ` Johannes Erdfelt
2019-09-06 17:17                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 21:16                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-07  0:33                           ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-07 10:37                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-16 10:36                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-17  0:31                                 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-17  6:37                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-17  6:46                                     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-17 14:29                                     ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-19 19:48                           ` Mihai Carabas
2019-09-06 16:55                       ` Raj, Ashok

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190905002132.GA26568@otc-nc-03 \
    --to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=Jon.Grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mihai.carabas@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.colp@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox