public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mm/KASLR: Cleanup calculation for direct mapping size
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 21:54:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190905135451.GD20805@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190830214707.1201-5-msys.mizuma@gmail.com>

On 08/30/19 at 05:47pm, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Cleanup calculation for direct mapping size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> index dc6182eec..8e5f3642e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> @@ -70,15 +70,45 @@ static inline bool kaslr_memory_enabled(void)
>  	return kaslr_enabled() && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Even though a huge virtual address space is reserved for the direct
> + * mapping of physical memory, e.g in 4-level paging mode, it's 64TB,
> + * rare system can own enough physical memory to use it up, most are
> + * even less than 1TB. So with KASLR enabled, we adapt the size of
> + * direct mapping area to the size of actual physical memory plus the
> + * configured padding CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING.
> + * The left part will be taken out to join memory randomization.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned long calc_direct_mapping_size(void)

I think patch 4 and 5 can be merged, just keep one
calc_direct_mapping_size() to do the mapping size calculation for the
direct mapping section, it's not that complicated. Adding
phys_memmap_size() makes it a little redundent, in my opinion.

Thanks
Baoquan

> +{
> +	unsigned long size_tb, memory_tb;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Update Physical memory mapping to available and
> +	 * add padding if needed (especially for memory hotplug support).
> +	 */
> +	memory_tb = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, 1UL << TB_SHIFT) +
> +		CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING;
> +
> +	size_tb = 1 << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS - TB_SHIFT);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Adapt physical memory region size based on available memory
> +	 */
> +	if (memory_tb < size_tb)
> +		size_tb = memory_tb;
> +
> +	return size_tb;
> +}
> +
>  /* Initialize base and padding for each memory region randomized with KASLR */
>  void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void)
>  {
> -	size_t i;
> -	unsigned long vaddr_start, vaddr;
> -	unsigned long rand, memory_tb;
> -	struct rnd_state rand_state;
> +	unsigned long vaddr_start, vaddr, rand;
>  	unsigned long remain_entropy;
>  	unsigned long vmemmap_size;
> +	struct rnd_state rand_state;
> +	size_t i;
>  
>  	vaddr_start = pgtable_l5_enabled() ? __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE_L5 : __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE_L4;
>  	vaddr = vaddr_start;
> @@ -95,20 +125,10 @@ void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void)
>  	if (!kaslr_memory_enabled())
>  		return;
>  
> -	kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = 1 << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS - TB_SHIFT);
> +	kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = calc_direct_mapping_size();
>  	kaslr_regions[1].size_tb = VMALLOC_SIZE_TB;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Update Physical memory mapping to available and
> -	 * add padding if needed (especially for memory hotplug support).
> -	 */
>  	BUG_ON(kaslr_regions[0].base != &page_offset_base);
> -	memory_tb = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, 1UL << TB_SHIFT) +
> -		CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING;
> -
> -	/* Adapt phyiscal memory region size based on available memory */
> -	if (memory_tb < kaslr_regions[0].size_tb)
> -		kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = memory_tb;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Calculate the vmemmap region size in TBs, aligned to a TB
> -- 
> 2.18.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-05 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-30 21:47 [PATCH v3 0/5] Adjust the padding size for KASLR Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-08-30 21:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/boot: Wrap up the SRAT traversing code into subtable_parse() Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-09-05 13:41   ` Baoquan He
2019-08-30 21:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86/boot: Add max_addr field in struct boot_params Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-09-05 13:43   ` Baoquan He
2019-08-30 21:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/boot: Get the max address from SRAT Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-09-05 13:51   ` Baoquan He
2019-10-29 15:53     ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-08-30 21:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mm/KASLR: Cleanup calculation for direct mapping size Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-09-05 13:54   ` Baoquan He [this message]
2019-10-29 15:55     ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-08-30 21:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] x86/mm/KASLR: Adjust the padding size for the direct mapping Masayoshi Mizuma
2019-10-29  2:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Adjust the padding size for KASLR Baoquan He
2019-10-29 15:58   ` Masayoshi Mizuma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190905135451.GD20805@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox