From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] posix-cpu-timers: Fix permission check regression
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 19:31:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190905173148.GE18251@lenoir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190905120539.797994508@linutronix.de>
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 02:03:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The recent consolidation of the three permission checks introduced a subtle
> regression. For timer_create() with a process wide timer it returns the
> current task if the lookup through the PID which is encoded into the
> clockid results in returning current.
>
> That's broken because it does not validate whether the current task is the
> group leader.
>
> That was caused by the two different variants of permission checks:
>
> - posix_cpu_timer_get() allowed access to the process wide clock when the
> looked up task is current. That's not an issue because the process wide
> clock is in the shared sighand.
>
> - posix_cpu_timer_create() made sure that the looked up task is the group
> leader.
>
> Restore the previous state.
>
> Note, that these permission checks are more than questionable, but that's
> subject to follow up changes.
>
> Fixes: 6ae40e3fdcd3 ("posix-cpu-timers: Provide task validation functions")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
> @@ -47,25 +47,42 @@ void update_rlimit_cpu(struct task_struc
> /*
> * Functions for validating access to tasks.
> */
> -static struct task_struct *lookup_task(const pid_t pid, bool thread)
> +static struct task_struct *lookup_task(const pid_t pid, bool thread,
> + bool gettime)
> {
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> + /*
> + * If the encoded PID is 0, then the timer is targeted at current
> + * or the process to which current belongs.
> + */
> if (!pid)
> return thread ? current : current->group_leader;
>
> p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> - if (!p || p == current)
> + if (!p)
> return p;
> +
> if (thread)
> return same_thread_group(p, current) ? p : NULL;
> - if (p == current)
> - return p;
> +
> + if (gettime) {
> + /*
> + * For clock_gettime() the task does not need to be the
> + * actual group leader. tsk->sighand gives access to the
> + * group's clock.
> + */
I'm a bit confused with the explanation. Why is it fine to do so with clock
and not with timer? tsk->sighand gives access to the group's timer as
well.
> + return (p == current || thread_group_leader(p)) ? p : NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * For processes require that p is group leader.
> + */
> return has_group_leader_pid(p) ? p : NULL;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-05 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-05 12:03 [patch 0/6] posix-cpu-timers: Fallout fixes and permission tightening Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 12:03 ` [patch 1/6] posix-cpu-timers: Always clear head pointer on dequeue Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 15:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-09-05 12:03 ` [patch 2/6] posix-cpu-timers: Fix permission check regression Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 17:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2019-09-05 18:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 21:15 ` [patch V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-09 15:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-09-10 11:18 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 12:03 ` [patch 3/6] posix-cpu-timers: Restrict timer_create() permissions Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-21 0:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-09-05 12:03 ` [patch 4/6] posix-cpu-timers: Restrict clock_gettime() permissions Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23 13:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-09-05 12:03 ` [patch 5/6] posix-cpu-timers: Sanitize thread clock permissions Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-05 14:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23 14:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-09-05 12:03 ` [patch 6/6] posix-cpu-timers: Make PID=0 and PID=self handling consistent Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-23 14:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-09-23 14:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 14:48 ` [patch 0/6] posix-cpu-timers: Fallout fixes and permission tightening Frederic Weisbecker
2019-09-05 14:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 15:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-09-05 20:32 ` Kees Cook
2019-09-05 21:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190905173148.GE18251@lenoir \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox