public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/15] sched,fair: ramp up task_se_h_weight quickly
Date: Fri,  6 Sep 2019 15:12:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190906191237.27006-14-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906191237.27006-1-riel@surriel.com>

The code in update_cfs_group / calc_group_shares has some logic to
quickly ramp up the load when a task has just started running in a
cgroup, in order to get sane values for the cgroup se->load.weight.

This code adds a similar hack to task_se_h_weight.

However, THIS CODE IS WRONG, since it does not do things hierarchically.

I am wondering a few things here:
1) Should I have something similar to the logic in calc_group_shares
   in update_cfs_rq_h_load?
2) If so, should I also use that fast-ramp-up value for task_h_load,
   to prevent the load balancer from thinking it is moving zero weight
   tasks around?
3) If update_cfs_rq_h_load is the wrong place, where should I be
   calculating a hierarchical group weight value, instead?

Not-yet-signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 84481c9ca51d..1049f2f4ae55 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7690,6 +7690,7 @@ static void update_cfs_rq_h_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 
 static unsigned long task_se_h_weight(struct sched_entity *se)
 {
+	unsigned long group_load;
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
 
 	if (!task_se_in_cgroup(se))
@@ -7698,8 +7699,12 @@ static unsigned long task_se_h_weight(struct sched_entity *se)
 	cfs_rq = group_cfs_rq_of_parent(se);
 	update_cfs_rq_h_load(cfs_rq);
 
+	/* Ramp up quickly to keep h_weight sane. */
+	group_load = max(scale_load_down(se->parent->load.weight),
+							cfs_rq->h_load);
+
 	/* Reduce the load.weight by the h_load of the group the task is in. */
-	return (cfs_rq->h_load * se->load.weight) >> SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT;
+	return (group_load * se->load.weight) >> SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT;
 }
 
 static unsigned long task_se_h_load(struct sched_entity *se)
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-06 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-06 19:12 [PATCH RFC v5 0/15] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched: change /proc/sched_debug fields Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched,fair: redefine runnable_load_avg as the sum of task_h_load Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched,fair: move runnable_load_avg to cfs_rq Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched,fair: remove cfs_rqs from leaf_cfs_rq_list bottom up Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched,cfs: use explicit cfs_rq of parent se helper Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched,cfs: fix zero length timeslice calculation Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched,fair: refactor enqueue/dequeue_entity Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched,fair: add helper functions for flattened runqueue Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched,fair: flatten hierarchical runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched,fair: flatten update_curr functionality Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched,fair: propagate sum_exec_runtime up the hierarchy Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched,fair: scale vdiff in wakeup_preempt_entity Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched,fair: remove se->depth Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190906191237.27006-14-riel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox