From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@analog.com>
Cc: <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>, <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
<lars@metafoo.de>, <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: accel: adxl372: Fix/remove limitation for FIFO samples
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 10:24:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190908102458.7ef6f1ed@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567502287-10199-1-git-send-email-stefan.popa@analog.com>
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:18:07 +0300
Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@analog.com> wrote:
> Currently, the driver sets the FIFO_SAMPLES register with the number of
> sample sets (maximum of 170 for 3 axis data, 256 for 2-axis and 512 for
> single axis). However, the FIFO_SAMPLES register should store the number
> of samples, regardless of how the FIFO format is configured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@analog.com>
This st->watermark field is also used to provide the hwfifo_watermark
sysfs attribute value. That value should be 'sets' not individual
samples. I'm not sure that's the case here. Note this also effects
the max and min values which will change depending on which channels
are enabled.
I've just checked the docs and watermark is clearly stated to be in
scans but the hwfifo_watermark is not. Which is unfortunate if
there are drivers interpreting it as being in samples as a result.
I haven't looked yet to see what other drivers have this interpreted
as...
Gah.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c | 9 ---------
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> index 055227cb..adec37b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> @@ -805,15 +805,6 @@ static int adxl372_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> st->fifo_format = adxl372_axis_lookup_table[i].fifo_format;
> st->fifo_set_size = bitmap_weight(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> indio_dev->masklength);
> - /*
> - * The 512 FIFO samples can be allotted in several ways, such as:
> - * 170 sample sets of concurrent 3-axis data
> - * 256 sample sets of concurrent 2-axis data (user selectable)
> - * 512 sample sets of single-axis data
> - */
> - if ((st->watermark * st->fifo_set_size) > ADXL372_FIFO_SIZE)
> - st->watermark = (ADXL372_FIFO_SIZE / st->fifo_set_size);
> -
> st->fifo_mode = ADXL372_FIFO_STREAMED;
>
> ret = adxl372_configure_fifo(st);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-08 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-03 9:18 [PATCH 1/3] iio: accel: adxl372: Fix/remove limitation for FIFO samples Stefan Popa
2019-09-08 9:24 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190908102458.7ef6f1ed@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=stefan.popa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox