From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F36C4332F for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FF720854 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:16:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567941407; bh=wVRmKL60wVlOm/tyjEk55fqdWDRTI9BBf/XK/zL+TVk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=mkONIYFHZ1/1N4OJK5O65ZYrjbn36w0VRiBn5a9AtF7zmJCsNvYnVlJDEsO0RttdY rIURg17pSoPgb7sHeMrU5q3VdsN8Yj8PV0Xd5XInqG/jnPaFwMj65n/2tvtMPsAc21 7brD3j2lCVuMBAPbZh2vdbExg0TVGMnwssoMNuQU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728837AbfIHLQc (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Sep 2019 07:16:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53358 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728753AbfIHLQa (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Sep 2019 07:16:30 -0400 Received: from archlinux (cpc149474-cmbg20-2-0-cust94.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.4.196.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BE5221734; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:16:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567941390; bh=wVRmKL60wVlOm/tyjEk55fqdWDRTI9BBf/XK/zL+TVk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VMGRFkm61R+D4fz5Nj+NsOd1PDoLkb7AKotZy82PByD2dAvfvbogS2baSK0OUp818 rz1vpKHcxbrh3Y/XKC/G4CiVHad4/rXmytjJWlv9TQ7KoJ0srrU//LX43f1vBStmji jHIK9PpCDOpmT2V84oFZaBa81wHXFsXnGuZfop2Y= Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:16:18 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Tony Lindgren Cc: William Breathitt Gray , David Lechner , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudA==?= Cousson , Thierry Reding , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] counter: new TI eQEP driver Message-ID: <20190908121618.3e7e5618@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20190905141053.GU52127@atomide.com> References: <20190901225827.12301-1-david@lechnology.com> <20190905133721.GA728346@icarus> <20190905141053.GU52127@atomide.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:10:53 -0700 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * William Breathitt Gray [190905 13:38]: > > On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 05:58:21PM -0500, David Lechner wrote: > > > This series adds device tree bindings and a new counter driver for the Texas > > > Instruments Enhanced Quadrature Encoder Pulse (eQEP). > > > > > > As mentioned in one of the commit messages, to start with, the driver only > > > supports reading the current counter value and setting the min/max values. > > > Other features can be added as the counter subsystem gains support for them. > ... > > > I'm satisfied with this version of the patchset. > > > > Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray > > > > Jonathan, if you have no objections please pick up this up so that it > > can make it to the 5.4 merge window coming in soon. Alternatively, I can > > merge it into my repository instead and hold it for a while longer > > there, if you prefer that route. > > Looks good to me too: > > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren Sorry, too close to the likely opening of the 5.4 merge window for it to go via IIO this cycle (unless there is a significant delay for some reason!) I'm happy to queue it up for 5.5 but before I do this, see replies to patch 1 about whether an immutable branch is needed as we are going across multiple trees. Thanks, Jonathan